[OKFN-Spain] Saludos y "sw libre y precio"

Jue Sep 12 22:44:01 UTC 2013

Yo lo veo perfecto.

Abrazos

2013/9/13 David Scarlatti <d_scarlatti en yahoo.es>

> Breve presentación: Hola a todos, acabo de seguir un rato de la junta
> directiva, y llevo unos días leyendo la lista de correo, los temas me
> resultan muy interesantes y tras el estupor inicial por el los primeros
> mensajes del hilo " Gobierno Abierto: Gasto, inversión y retorno <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-sp/2013-September/001687.html>
>   " me ha gustado como se ha reconducido, os felicito. En lo que pueda
> iré aportando mi granito de arena.
>
> Quería hacer una sugerencia sobre el tema "sw libre y precio":
>
> Siempre me ha gustado la posición de la Free Software Foundation al
> respecto, que se recoge aquí:
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html
> Y que, entre otras cosas, dice:
>
>    - “free software” is a matter of liberty, not price. To understand the
>    concept, you should think of “free” as in “free speech,” not as in “free
>    beer”
>    - You may have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may
>    have obtained copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your
>    copies, you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even
>    to sell copies.
>
> FSF se desmarca del termino Open Source: "Another group has started using
> the term “open source” to mean something close (but not identical) to “free
> software”. We prefer the term “free software” because, once you have heard
> that it refers to freedom rather than price, it calls to mind freedom."
>
> Y aclara "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but
> they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. *Open
> source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.*For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
> essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
> open source considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—in a
> practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution
> to the practical problem at hand. For the free software movement, however,
> nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution is to stop using it
> and move to free software." (ver
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html)
>
> Leyendo la visión de OKF, me parece que el software utilizado para
> procesar el "material" debe cumplir los mismos requisitos que el "material"
> (free and open access, freedom to redistribute, freedom to reuse)
>
> Creo que el paralelismo OFKN / FSF es claro:
>
> *OFKN*
> Free and open access to the material
> Freedom to redistribute the material
> Freedom to reuse the material
> No restriction of the above based on who someone is (e.g. their
> nationality) or their field of endeavour (e.g. commercial or non-commercial)
>
>
> *FSF*
> The freedom to run the program, for any purpose (freedom 0).
>  The freedom to study how the program works, and change it so it does
> your computing as you wish (freedom 1). Access to the source code is a
> precondition for this.
> The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom
> 2).
> The freedom to distribute copies of your modified versions to others
> (freedom 3). By doing this you can give the whole community a chance to
> benefit from your changes. Access to the source code is a precondition for
> this.
>
>
> ¿Tiene sentido decir que la posición de OFKN (Spain incluido) al respecto
> "sw libre y precio" es la de la FSF? ¿Lo veis suficiente?
>
> Un Saludo.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OKFN-SP mailing list
> OKFN-SP en lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-sp
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-sp
>
>

-- 
Saludos

twitter: @rsantos_tlf

¡¡Ñu!!
-
------------ próxima parte ------------
Se ha borrado un adjunto en formato HTML...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-sp/attachments/20130913/a3df0241/attachment-0002.html>