[okfn-tw] Fwd: [ogp] Report on NASA's progress on Early #OpenGov Initiatives

Sat May 21 00:49:20 UTC 2016

這份蠻特殊的，主要是針對機構本身由第三方角度來審視機構的開放政府計畫。

我印象中國發會、工業局或是其他部會似乎沒有這樣的 IRM (independent report mechanism) 報告？有的話也請不吝提供連結。

sent from mobile device
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Megan Eskey via Dgroups" <ogp at dgroups.org>
Date: May 21, 2016 08:03
Subject: [ogp] Report on NASA's progress on Early #OpenGov Initiatives
To: "OGP Civil Society group" <ogp at dgroups.org>
Cc:

OGP Civil Society Groups -
>
> Here is my final draft of NASA's OGP IRM report for the Early OpenGov
> Initiatives up to the present.  I was the NASA Ames OpenGov Lead in 2011,
> so have a comprehensive view of NASA's commitments.   Two of NASA's OpenGov
> plans are included in the IRM report. The US is just beginning the process
> of planning for the next phase of agency-level OpenGov plans.
>
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HVwtxil69kqw0HI4mfELthtQQpMaiDDNemOU47Dch6U/edit
>
> I understand that the OGP does not have a formal process for submitting
> agency-level IRM reports, so I hope to get feedback from the IRM and the
> IEP to edit my report to fit the standard formats for these reports.  I
> doubt that this report is complete in the eyes of the OGP, but I am
> probably not the right person to complete it.  Hence my recommendation to
> set up formal review processes here in the US for all of the federal
> agencies' OpenGov plans and Flagship Initiatives.
>
> The report is not flattering to NASA, but there are positive gains as
> well, especially in the open private sector goals of the OGP.  NASA's
> NewSpace startup community integrates many open processes, and includes
> some good candidates for engagement with the OGP via the Private Sector
> Council.  SpaceX is the best example, with a sophisticated understanding of
> exponential technology, and related projects that help to further the
> Sustainability Development Goals (SDGs).
>
> The OpenStack plagiarism is the most egregious example of malfeasance by
> NASA's OpenGov team, but there were many others over the years.  I cover
> NASA's OpenGov activities from 2009 on, when the White House released the
> OpenGov memo, two years before the formation of the OGP.  I have submitted
> the entire report to the NASA Office of the Inspectors General (OIG), and
> hope to see an audit of NASA's OpenGov program from that office within the
> next few months.
>
> There is no connection between the Nebula cloud computing architecture and
> OpenStack in spite of the team's claims.  Here is the architecture document
> that was presented after OpenStack was released to the public as open
> source if you would like to validate this for yourselves.  Cloud
> Computing: Architecture, IT Security and Operational Perspectives
> <http://www.slideshare.net/meskey/cloud-computing-architecture-it-security-and-operational-perspectives>
>
> Cloud Computing: Architecture, IT Security and Operational Perspectives
> A 2010 presentation on NASA Nebula that makes no reference to OpenStack
> (or pinet) dated a month after OpenStack...
>
> <http://www.slideshare.net/meskey/cloud-computing-architecture-it-security-and-operational-perspectives>
>
>
> I have made suggestions for remedies in the report, and have named the
> managers who were involved because there was a legal process associated
> with NASA OpenGov from 2011 - 2014.  All of the information in the report
> is public domain information, so please share freely.  I hope to get
> additional recommendations for improvements to NASA's OpenGov program from
> civil society, the IEP and the IRM.
>
> Although my report may seem to be relentlessly critical of NASA's OpenGov
> effort, there were some bright spots such as NASA's NewSpace activities
> which are not open by default, but do effectively leverage many more open
> processes than NASA. It was nice to bring that into the report via the
> OGP's call for private sector engagement, as I am generally not such a
> negative person. But given my experiences at NASA Ames, I don't think
> anyone would expect anything "open washed" in an attempt to ingratiate
> myself with NASA's new management.
>
> Now, for the turnaround phase of the program. Looking forward to seeing
> some big changes at NASA in the next few months.
>
> Thanks much, and please don't hesitate to contact me with questions and
> feedback.
>
> Megan Eskey
> OpenGov Lead, 2011
> NASA Ames Research Center
> Moffett Field, CA 94035
>
>
> The following attachments were removed from this message and stored in the
> library:
>
> IndependentReportingMechanism.docx <https://dgroups.org/?fcp0tcz8.0>
> (1.0MB)
>
> You are receiving this message because you are a member of the community OGP
> Civil Society group <https://dgroups.org/hivos/ogp>.
>
> View this contribution on the web site <https://dgroups.org/_/fcp0tcz8>
>
> A reply to this message will be sent *ONLY* to the sender; it will NOT be
> archived on the web site.
>
> Reply to all community members <ogp at dgroups.org> | Unsubscribe
> <leave.ogp at dgroups.org>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/okfn-tw/attachments/20160521/2419f374/attachment-0003.html>
-------------- next part --------------
The server removed the attached files from this message and replaced them with links to save your bandwidth and space in your inbox. You may download all files by clicking on the links included at the bottom of the message.