[okfn-za] Information rejected on the grounds that it may endanger human life.

[Adi Eyal]

I will write a blog specifically addressing my experiences. According
to the PAIA act, non-response is considered a rejection. I have been
trying to contact Treasury for 3 months now with no response at all. A
few other departments are equally useless.

Adi

On 12 August 2013 16:23, Justin Arenstein <justinarenstein at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Adi,
>
> In support of Steve's suggestion, AMI would help getting your blog
> syndicated / quoted by our local media partners + on wider platforms like
> AllAfrica.org or IJNet.org.
>
> Give me a shout if you'd like to chat.
>
> Cheers,
> Justin
>
> Justin Arenstein
>
> SA Mobile: +27.82.374.0812
> US Mobile: +1.650.336.5878
> Skype: JustinArenstein
> Twitter: JustinArenstein
> Web: http://www.linkedin.com/in/JustinArenstein
>
> PGP Key Fingerprint: 8B19 3C53 2B40 453B F48D 9D7A 7346 A3AE DB88 30CD
> Do you want to email me confidentially? See: http://bit.ly/VLJt1N
>
>
>
>
> On 7 August 2013 15:50, Song, Stephen <stephen.song at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Adi,
>>
>> Better to blog about it than appeal.  When my PAIA request last year for
>> Telkom's terrestrial fibre map was rejected, I wrote about it
>> (http://manypossibilities.net/2012/01/a-gentle-plea-to-telkoms-ceo/).  The
>> story was picked up by the tech media and within 24hrs I had a phone call
>> from Telkom PR castigating me for not going through appropriate channels but
>> offering up the map nonetheless.
>>
>> Perhaps the M&G could be convinced to do a small piece on the
>> ineffectiveness of PAIA.   The notion of Open Source as trade secret could
>> make a good news headline.
>>
>> Regards... Steve
>>
>> On 7 August 2013 04:45, Adi Eyal <adi at burgercom.co.za> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> As a follow-up to my previous email on a government software audit - I
>>> received a rejection from the Department of Agriculture, Forestry and
>>> Fisheries. They rejected it on the basis of Sections 36 and 38 of the
>>> PAIA Act.
>>> (https://github.com/adieyal/gov-software-audit/raw/master/receipts/daff.pdf)
>>>
>>> This makes me smile a little as Section 36 implies that knowledge of
>>> the software used by government can be considered to be a trade
>>> secret. Section 38 suggests that lives might be endangered if this
>>> information were to be released to the public.
>>>
>>> I have an opportunity to appeal the decision but I thought I had to
>>> share.
>>>
>>> Adi
>>>
>>> --
>>> Adi Eyal
>>> Data Specialist
>>> phone: +27 78 014 2469
>>> skype: adieyalcas
>>> linkedin: http://za.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Adi/Eyal
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> okfn-za mailing list
>>> okfn-za at lists.okfn.org
>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-za
>>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-za
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steve Song
>> +1 902 529 0046
>> http://manypossibilities.net
>> http://villagetelco.org
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> okfn-za mailing list
>> okfn-za at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-za
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-za
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> okfn-za mailing list
> okfn-za at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-za
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/okfn-za
>



-- 
Adi Eyal
Data Specialist
phone: +27 78 014 2469
skype: adieyalcas
linkedin: http://za.linkedin.com/pub/dir/Adi/Eyal