[Open-access] science quality

[Mike Taylor]

I'd not heard of Richard Smith either until a week ago when he wrote
this blog at the BMJ:
http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2012/06/28/richard-smith-a-bad-bad-week-for-access/
and then this one:
http://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2012/07/03/richard-smith-medical-journals-a-gaggle-of-golden-geese/

Some excellent, hard-hitting stuff.

-- Mike.



On 14 July 2012 06:58, Tom Olijhoek <tom.olijhoek at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Peter and other list members,
>
> I just happened to find very interesting info on quality of medical
> journals, new forms for peer review, patient-doctor interactions to improve
> science and treatments, journal of participatory medicine to aid the former,
> Ovations initiative for combating chronic diseases in developed and
> developing world.
> All this because I read an article on scientific quality mentioning Richard
> Smith and started looking:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Smith_(editor)
>
> I am amazed that I haven't come across this before,since he is one of the
> early proponents of open access publishing. But some of you may know him and
> his work?
> Definitely worth following up in my opinion
>
> TOM
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-access mailing list
> open-access at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
>