[Open-access] SSRN Paper from Google Policy Unit

Wed Jul 18 14:23:11 UTC 2012

It's worth noting that the problem here is that SSRN doesn't set a default licence, or encourage people directly to state one. This is a policy decision, they feel that it is the authors business. I have on at least one occasion argued with Gregg about this and they did say they would take a look at it, but if a bunch of people were to ask whether clear licenses could be provided that might convince them that it's an issue worth looking at.

Cheers

Cameron

On 18 Jul 2012, at 13:54, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:52 AM, Tom Olijhoek <tom.olijhoek at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Cameron,
> 
> Thanks. The paper now checks as CC-BY 3.0 !!
> 
> I think many repositories ritually add CC-NC because they think it's the right thing to do. Some will react positively when it is pointed out that it isn't.
> 
> P.
>  
> 
> TOM
> 
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:59 AM, cameronneylon.net <cn at cameronneylon.net> wrote:
> Done!
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> should be cc by now in the PDF: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2104350
>> 
>> 
>> Yea let me work that out with Derek and Betsy. We'll need to reupload I think. For the time being I think it's safe to assume it's CC BY.
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 4:44 AM, cameronneylon.net <cn at cameronneylon.net> wrote:
>> Hi Alex
>> 
>> Thanks for the link to this paper. Any chance of persuading the authors to put up a version with a clear CC-BY licence on the paper itself (see below)? SSRN doesn't have clear licensing and I think folks are keen to re-use parts of this legitimately if possible. It's a really nice summary.
>> 
>> Cheers
>> 
>> Cameron
>> 
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: Tom Olijhoek <tom.olijhoek at gmail.com>
>>> Subject: Re: [Open-access] SSRN Paper from Google Policy Unit
>>> Date: 17 July 2012 12:22:23 GMT+01:00
>>> To: "cameronneylon.net" <cn at cameronneylon.net>, open-access at lists.okfn.org
>>> 
>>> Hi Cameron,
>>> 
>>> Great paper. Thanks for the link!  
>>> It is a free download but what about the terms of use on the link page for this paper ? Are we only allowed to read this?? "you are not allowed to use any of the content of an epaper except the abstract  for non-commercial or commercial purposes" as I read it.
>>> 
>>> TOM
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:44 AM, cameronneylon.net <cn at cameronneylon.net> wrote:
>>> This is a nice paper from some people in the Google Policy unit. The last section draws together a lot of the evidence around the economic advantages of Open Access and Open Data.
>>> 
>>> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2104350
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> 
>>> Cameron
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> open-access mailing list
>>> open-access at lists.okfn.org
>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> - ∀x
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> - ∀x
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> open-access mailing list
> open-access at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-access/attachments/20120718/e5f91840/attachment.html>