[Open-access] [open-science] OKF at Open Repositories 2014

Thu Dec 5 11:30:37 UTC 2013

SWORD is a technically superior solution, because it's a single
protocol that can be implemented by multiple clients and multiple
servers in an interoperable way. A client developed to use any given
repo's own API will be be re-usable elsewhere.

-- Mike.

On 5 December 2013 11:28, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Mark MacGillivray <mark at cottagelabs.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Does this mean that CKAN groks SWORD? If so this is good news.
>>
>> Unfortunately no - repo systems like dpsace and eprints do, but not CKAN
>> yet. We have looked at it and it would not be hard, but it has not been done
>> yet, mainly because CKAN has never focussed on being an academic repo before
>> so has not needed to grok SWORD.
>>
>
> CKAN has its  own API so if there is a Java client I'll use that - I don't
> think SWORD gives a technical advantage - it might give a political one.
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-access mailing list
> open-access at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-access
>