[Open-access] [open-science] OKF at Open Repositories 2014

Fri Dec 6 14:43:54 UTC 2013

For the record, let me defend the “French” model (since there seems to be a Liege one):
- central repository to minimise costs and improve visibility (you’ve all hear of HAL, can you name the on at the University of Stirling?)
- freedom for institution to define their deposit policy (but I am proud of the Inria mandate)
- availability of all content for data mining (OK, you’ll see no CC on the current version, but the new (codename V3) version should go CC-BY (of course; I just wonder why one would ask…)
OK. Peter, our PhD repository (tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/‎) is full of boring stuff in French, but if you’re interested, do index!

To answer the current argument on repositories. The most important thing for me is to ensure that we have a public and sustainable research infrastructure (all words are important). I now see colleagues rushing to ResearchGate or Acdemia just because they receive nice messages tickling their ego and they don’t even notice that their online papers in HAL are downloaded 50 times more. OK, it’s maybe our fault that we do not provide adequate statistics and that we do not consider researchers’ ego enough.

Cheers,
Laurent

Le 6 déc. 2013 à 08:09, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> a écrit :

> For nearly ten years I have tried to promote the idea of indexing or repositories and got nowhere. I wish it were different. As examples:
> 
> * I ran a funded JISC (UK) project on Open Bibliography.I offered to explore the indexing of theses (unlike NL it is impossible to find online theses in UK other than manually trawling through 200 repos). I presented to the ETHOS project but their priority was to digitize the past.They told me I would have to seek permission from every individual author.
> 
> * I wrote to Bernard Rentier offering to come to Liege and investigate indexing the ORBI repository on a scientific basis. His repsonse was that they were taking a staged approach and that [paraphrasing] I should wait a few years.
> 
> * After a tweet I thought that LSE was intested and blogged a proposal to index it. They weren't actually interested.
> 
> * I wrote several times to the Cambridge Librarian about text-mining. She never acknowledged my mails.
> 
> More generally:
> 
> * repo owners are no interested in anyone outside their library doing anything with their content. They have a ?10-year (or longer) plan to federate them
> 
> * some repo owners (including Liege) deliberately choose CC-NC and refuse to change.
> 
> So personally I have become disillusions with conventional repos. The UK REF makes it worse as the sole purpose of many repos seems to be to accumulate the content on which the university is formally judged.This does not have to be Open. The mentality is not a service positively exposing content to the world but a bureaucratic management process.
> 
> It may be different in other countries...
> 
> 
> No - trying to index even one UK
> 
> 
> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:07 AM, Mike Taylor <mike at indexdata.com> wrote:
> Well, sure! I'm not criticising the vision; I'm criticising how far
> short of that vision the world we live in currently falls!
> 
> You may find it irrational that an institution wants its faculty's
> papers openly available only from their IR and nowhere else. People
> whose job it is to count beans will disagree. Needless to say, I'm on
> your side, but there's no point in pretending the bean-counters don't
> exist.
> 
> -- Mike.
> 
> 
> On 5 December 2013 23:53, Bjoern Brembs <b.brembs at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Friday, December 6, 2013, 12:45:25 AM, you wrote:
> >
> >> They want the world to come to their one
> >> special magic web-site and read the papers only there. Which is not
> >> that much more advanced than the position of paywalled publishers.
> >
> > Perhaps I'm really hopelessly naive, but this
> > seems so irrational, it shouldn't take much to
> > move beyond this argument.
> >
> >> The real issues here are much more social than technical. As usual.
> >
> > There is no debating that, I guess :-) Which is
> > why visions are important: visions get people
> > motivated to be a part in realizing them.
> > I believe the vision of getting everything in one place,
> > filtered, sorted and immensely relevant is
> > powerful!
> >
> > Bjoern
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Björn Brembs
> > ---------------------------------------------
> > http://brembs.net
> > Neurogenetics
> > Universität Regensburg
> > Germany
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > open-access mailing list
> > open-access at lists.okfn.org
> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
> > Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-access
> _______________________________________________
> open-access mailing list
> open-access at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-access
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069
> _______________________________________________
> open-access mailing list
> open-access at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-access

Laurent Romary
INRIA & HUB-IDSL
laurent.romary at inria.fr

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-access/attachments/20131206/9d7946a4/attachment-0002.html>