[Open-access] CC-BY v. CC-BY-SA
Pierre-Carl Langlais
pierrecarl.langlais at gmail.com
Mon Jan 27 12:15:57 UTC 2014
Hi everyone,
I've made some careful reading of the Creative Commons terms. While the
differences between CC-By and CC-By-SA remain somewhat fuzzy, the
interpretation of Mike Taylor sounds quite sensible: "my understanding
of the distinction between CC By and CC By-SA is now that the former is
viral only with respect to COPIES of the document so licenced, whereas
the latter is also viral with respect to derivative works."
So what can we do with a CC-By?
1. Republish the original work under a stricter license or traditional
copyright: clearly no. That would certainly go against the /No
additional restriction/ specification: "You may not apply legal terms or
technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything
the license permits."
2. Republish the original work under stricter license / copyright with
wide modifications: probably OK. We can deduce from the absence of the
Share Alike, that CC-By works can be redistributed under other terms
whenever one "remix, transform, or build upon the material"
2. Republish the original work under stricter license / copyright with
minor modifications: grey area. Minor modifications are probably not
enough to claim a transformative use.
3. Make some data-mining with the original work: probably OK. Recent
jurisprudence showed that data-mining is a transformative use (see the
recent Google Books decision...)
4. Republish the original work, yet within an innovative reading frame:
grey area. This is certainly transformative, although the original work
remains untouched.
CC-By is, so far, not a simple license. While the legal mechanism is
sounder than I thought (with an efficient frame to guarantee the
preservation of the original license), it gives way to numerous greay
areas. The easier way is clearly to state that the original work « was »
in CC-By and links to the original version (which is no more complicated
than giving the credits to the original authors).
PCL
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-access/attachments/20140127/bbed276c/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the open-access
mailing list