[Open-access] How do you evaluate Open Access Journals?

Mon Feb 9 10:04:10 UTC 2015

A help might be the official Norwegian selection of journals that will be accepted publications venues for Norwegian authors getting “points” for their institution, resulting in increased funding for the institution.
A scientific level of 1 (ordinary) or 2 (outstanding) indicates a journal with a minimum level of quality assurance. ( A level of “-“ indicates the journal does not have this quality.) The list is not without errors, but they try to keep the criminal and criminally bad journals out.
If a journal is not listed, it has not been evaluated – you can create an account, and ask to have it accredited.
https://dbh.nsd.uib.no/publiseringskanaler/Forside?request_locale=en

Best,
Jan Erik

Jan Erik Frantsvåg
Open Access adviser
The University Library
UiT The Arctic University of Norway
phone +47 77 64 49 50
e-mail jan.e.frantsvag at uit.no<mailto:jan.e.frantsvag at uit.no>
http://en.uit.no/ansatte/organisasjon/ansatte/person?p_document_id=43618&p_dimension_id=88187
Publications: http://tinyurl.com/6rycjns
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3413-8799

From: open-access [mailto:open-access-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Ferrero
Sent: 7. februar 2015 22:00
To: OpenScience mailing list; open-access at lists.okfn.org
Subject: [Open-access] How do you evaluate Open Access Journals?

Hi everybody I'm about to persuade the National Psychological Association (Ordine Nazionale degli Psicologi: don't know the right translation) to insert an Open Access Journals list on their sites.

Then a question came out: How do we evaluate all these Open Access Journals?

While the usual Academic Journals are reviewed, how can we say whether an Open Access journal is a good source or just trash?

How can we say researchers don't pay to publish their works, and other stuff?

Can we rely on the impact factor? How?

The provisory list is HERE:

http://bit.ly/openaccessjournals

(I didn't created it, but I was unable to find the creator)

And: what "APC" and "waivers" stand for?

Thank you!

Ivan

[photo]

Dr Ivan Ferrero
Digital Psychologist, Mind-Body Psychotherapist
m:+393334339624<tel:+393334339624> | e:ivan.ferrero1975 at gmail.com<mailto:ivan.ferrero1975 at gmail.com> | w:www.ivanferrero.it<http://www.ivanferrero.it> | a: via Felice Bisleri 11, Milano (Italy)
[https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/googleplus.png]<http://plus.google.com/+IvanferreroIt> [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/twitter.png] <http://twitter.com/IvanPsy>  [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/linkedin.png] <http://it.linkedin.com/in/ivanpsy/>  [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/pinterest.png] <http://www.pinterest.com/ivanpsy/>  [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/instagram.png] <http://instagram.com/ivanpsy/>  [https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/youtube.png] <http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCwtpXynvhq5PG7K22q55-Qg>

[https://s3.amazonaws.com/images.wisestamp.com/icons/twitter.png]
Latest Tweet:<https://twitter.com/IvanPsy> 27 chrome tabs and now it's frozen: maybe I forced my old #mac<https://twitter.com/mac> too much? ;-) http://t.co/1jPCw1E4mE http://t.co/Bfv1Xgj3rz Read More<https://twitter.com/IvanPsy/statuses/563403357382258688>
From My Google Plus Page 27 chrome tabs and now it's frozen: maybe I forced my old<https://plus.google.com/108685563399602479492/posts/DR7WBYv1dg2>
[http://ws-stats.appspot.com/ga/pixel.png?yes__count=1&e=promo_45]Get a signature like this: <http://ws-stats.appspot.com/r?rdata=eyJydXJsIjogImh0dHA6Ly93d3cud2lzZXN0YW1wLmNvbS8/dXRtX3NvdXJjZT1leHRlbnNpb24mdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbCZ1dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249cHJvbW9fNDUiLCAiZSI6ICJwcm9tb180NV9jbGljayJ9> Click here!<http://ws-stats.appspot.com/r?rdata=eyJydXJsIjogImh0dHA6Ly93d3cud2lzZXN0YW1wLmNvbS8/dXRtX3NvdXJjZT1leHRlbnNpb24mdXRtX21lZGl1bT1lbWFpbCZ1dG1fY2FtcGFpZ249cHJvbW9fNDUiLCAiZSI6ICJwcm9tb180NV9jbGljayJ9>
[https://ws-stats.appspot.com/ga/pixel.png?dont_count=true]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-access/attachments/20150209/4a26b8ab/attachment-0002.html>