<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Hello,<br>
      <br>
      On 02.05.2014 12:33, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAD2k14Od=Xy-0i_Zy4W14-sEXwOXbmdhRzXQ-bApEkyE9D8LwA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr"><br>
        <div class="gmail_extra">On Fri, May 2, 2014 at 11:01 AM, Tom
          Olijhoek <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:tom.olijhoek@gmail.com" target="_blank">tom.olijhoek@gmail.com</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
              <div dir="ltr"><br>
                <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">
                    <div class="">
                      <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px
                        0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex">
                        <div dir="ltr">
                          <div class="gmail_extra">
                            <div class="gmail_quote">
                              <div>Can you expand on the re-use fees?
                                This is an additional cost to
                                subscriptions. Re-use payments are at
                                least as problematic as subscriptions.
                                But even harder to get a handle on.
                                (?more FOIs?)</div>
                              <div>
                                <div>
                                  <div><br>
                                  </div>
                                </div>
                              </div>
                            </div>
                          </div>
                        </div>
                      </blockquote>
                    </div>
                    <div>I would think that copyright law always
                      includes fair use policy which applies especially
                      to use for educational purposes? </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </blockquote>
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Not as I understand it. There is no Fair Use in UK. Is
              there in NL? Using photocopies of articles from journals,
              even if you subscribe, could land you in court. University
              librarians often stick warning notices to photocopiers in
              UK warning that (at best) it's purely private use.</div>
          </div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    No, there isn't, but there is equivalent law that allows particular
    types of re-use, including citation, criticism, parody, etc., which
    roughly covers what is covered by fair use in the states. If my
    memory serves me, this includes an educational exception; I'm not
    sure about re-use. <br>
    <br>
    Here in Germany (I am originally Dutch), the laws are a bit more
    restictive -- we were told that republication of content
    (technically including things like images on lecture slides) is
    restricted to a classroom group (up to 30 people, if memory serves).
    I don't know about research in this case.<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    While reading this thread, something occurred to me: what exactly is
    covered by 're-use'? When I cite an article, say from Elsevier, do I
    have to have paid for it (or obtained it under some other license)
    to be allowed to cite it? In computer science literature, I
    sometimes see a tendency to 'cite the original source', even when
    this is an old book that noone has access to. Ideologically there's
    the obvious problem that you should read everything you cite, but
    aside from that: does copyright law really have any say in that, or
    am I just being paranoid?<br>
    <br>
    <br>
    As an aside: thanks to everyone for their sharing and the
    interesting discussions, I've been quietly reading and enjoying this
    discussion for quite some time now.<br>
    <br>
    Greetings,<br>
    Rens van der Heijden<br>
    PhD candidate<br>
    Institute of distributed systems<br>
    University of Ulm<br>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAD2k14Od=Xy-0i_Zy4W14-sEXwOXbmdhRzXQ-bApEkyE9D8LwA@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_extra">
          <div class="gmail_quote">
            <div><br>
            </div>
            <div>Read <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use</a>
              and weep.</div>
            <div><br>
            </div>
          </div>
          -- <br>
          Peter Murray-Rust<br>
          Reader in Molecular Informatics<br>
          Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry<br>
          University of Cambridge<br>
          CB2 1EW, UK<br>
          +44-1223-763069
        </div>
      </div>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
open-access mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:open-access@lists.okfn.org">open-access@lists.okfn.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access">https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-access</a>
Unsubscribe: <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-access">https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-access</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>