[open-archaeology] AIA and open access

Sun Apr 29 21:45:26 UTC 2012

Thanks Colleen - all your edits look great to me :-)

Cheers

L.

On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Colleen Morgan <clmorgan at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've signed the letter, but I should warn the previous signees that I
> made a few very very minor adjustments for clarity.
>
> I hope the AIA won't see this as a reason not to fund me in the future!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Colleen
>
> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Leif Isaksen <leifuss at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jess
>>
>> +1 for common sense - the letter would probably be more appropriate
>> there than on AWBG. It would be good if folks can reference it on
>> twitter, etc. as well though so that we aren't merely preaching to the
>> converted.
>>
>> all the best
>>
>> L.
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Jessica Ogden
>> <jessogdogg at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> Hiya -
>>>
>>> Think this should be posted to the Open Archaeology blog seeing how that's
>>> where this discussion has been taking place.
>>>
>>> Steko- is there a way to sign up for an account to the blog to post? Maybe
>>> I'm just confused but has it been subsumed by the main OKF blog?
>>>
>>> Jess
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 5:00 PM, Leif Isaksen <leifuss at googlemail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> I've made a quick adjustment to acknowledge that Elizabeth has
>>>> responded constructively to Chuck and Sebastian's piece. This is a
>>>> last call for anyone who wants to stick their name on it. Tomorrow
>>>> I'll post on Ancient World Bloggers Group.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> L.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Stefano Costa <stefano.costa at okfn.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Il 27/04/2012 23:21, Charles E. Jones ha scritto:
>>>> >
>>>> >> AIA has responded publicly
>>>> >> http://www.archaeological.org/news/8905
>>>> >>
>>>> >> This is a good start,
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > A very promising start indeed. I would like to thank you and Sebastian
>>>> > for
>>>> > turning a potential fight (or flamewar, to be more specific) into a
>>>> > dialogue.
>>>> >
>>>> > I have read the letter that Leif wrote. I think it reflects the views of
>>>> > many of us, and addresses the AIA position in a more general way than a
>>>> > specific exegesis of the editorial that started it all. That letter is
>>>> > our
>>>> > way of building a dialogue, not only a position statement.
>>>> >
>>>> > There may be an error at the end of line 169, or instead I may have a
>>>> > wrong
>>>> > view on British humour. I have added an excerpt from the AIA mission
>>>> > statement, that I found relevant in that point of the text.
>>>> >
>>>> > I've signed it, and I ask all those who see an opportunity to make open
>>>> > access more widespread and accepted on the basis of an informed decision
>>>> > to
>>>> > do the same. I think the next challenge will be our ability to move this
>>>> > same dialogue to other countries (Italy and Germany come to mind in this
>>>> > moment).
>>>> >
>>>> > Thanks a lot to Leif!
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Stefano
>>>> >
>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>> > open-archaeology mailing list
>>>> > open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
>>>> > http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> open-archaeology mailing list
>>>> open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
>>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-archaeology mailing list
>> open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-archaeology mailing list
> open-archaeology at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-archaeology