[open-bibliography] TSB fund for metadata projects

Tue Aug 3 18:44:01 UTC 2010

Building upon an existing model like Mendeley's certainly sounds
interesting... I wonder if they have the capacity to get involved in a move
toward monographs?

Paul

On 3 August 2010 19:40, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org>wrote:
>
>> Wonder if there's any scope here for doing something on open
>> bibliographic metadata?
>>
>>
>> http://www.innovateuk.org/content/competition/collaborative-research-and-developmentmetadata-increasing-the-value-of-digital-content-m.ashx
>>
>>
> I'd be excited if we could mirror Mendeley's approach for scientific
> metadata. Could we create a client like M's that would record the metadata
> of a book and allow users to share their mdata and experience? I think M's
> client would work well in this area  and would avoid rewriting anything.
>
> We have to have an SME and I think this makes sense?
>
> P.
>
> --
>>
>> Jonathan Gray
>>
>> Community Coordinator
>> The Open Knowledge Foundation
>> http://blog.okfn.org
>>
>> http://twitter.com/jwyg
>> http://identi.ca/jwyg
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> open-bibliography mailing list
>> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>
>

-- 
Dr *Paul Miller*, Cloud of Data
cloudofdata.com/contact
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-bibliography/attachments/20100803/4083cde6/attachment-0001.html>