[open-bibliography] comprehensive bibliographic database of "open" resources?

[Ross Singer]

Peter,

It's interesting that you attack libraries for not doing anything; I think
they would be more than happy to be given reasonable suggestions.

Actually, libraries generally blame *academics* for the sorry state of
affairs in this arena:  they absolutely refuse to care about the license
agreements they sign off on to their intellectual output.  That being said,
there are no rights on the metadata itself.  That can be indexed anywhere,
it's just the content that has restrictions.

Plenty of universities have departments (in the library!) to help faculty
negotiate greener licenses or to submit pre/post prints to their
repositories, but you can only lead that horse to water.  Without some
faculty support, it's going to be tough for libraries (esp. non-research
libraries at larger universities) to keep up with all of the publications of
their faculty.

-Ross.

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:52 AM, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:33 AM, Jim Pitman <pitman at stat.berkeley.edu>wrote:
>
>> Karen Coyle <kcoyle at kcoyle.net> wrote:
>>
>> >
>>  Thanks Karen for the pointer and prompt.
>> I have been offline a few days and only just read Peter's post.
>>
>
> It was only sent a few hours ago!
>
>
>> Of course, it was precisely
>> his sentiments exactly which motiviated the BKN project. We've been
>> trying, but its been a struggle, and
>> our proposals for grant renewal were denied by NSF. Elements of these
>> proposals could easily be recycled into
>> other potentially more successful efforts.
>
>
> I agree. We have much of the planning done. We understand the data/metadata
>
>
>> We have some limited funding left, and I expect to
>> get continuing trickles from various sources. But I am a professional
>> mathematician not a professional librarian or software developer.
>>
>
> And I'm a professional chemist!
>
>
>> I'd rather spend my time doing math research (or even math biblio
>> research) than biblio infra development. So I'd love to see someone more
>> mainstream in the
>> library community pick up this theme with some spurring which the likes of
>> Peter and myself could gladly provide.
>>
>
> Yes. I hope we can get enough people interested. There are a few librarians
> like Harvard who occasionally put their heads over the parapet and say "we
> mandateX be Open" - and then they disappear. It's actually trivial (and
> completely safe) for librarians to start working in this area. They won't go
> to jail. If the universities are sued - and they probably will be for
> challenging monopolies - the cases can be defended.
>
>
>> Moral/legal support and provision of a fiscal shell for coordination of
>> activities by a non-profit like OKFN would help.
>>
>
> And although I am only one of OKFN I think the input is good and continuing
>
>
>> I think I've learned some lessons from how difficult it has been to make
>> progress in this area.
>> I'll collect my thoughts on potential strategies, of which there are many,
>> and be glad to share with this group
>> if there is suitable encouragement.
>> Anyone interested in contributing to this effort, please contact me
>> directly, and if there is enough interest maybe Jonathan you could
>> organize a suitable communication forum beneath OKFN?
>>
>
> Agreed.
>
>
>> many thanks
>> --Jim
>> ----------------------------------------------
>> Jim Pitman
>> Director, Bibliographic Knowledge Network Project
>> http://www.bibkn.org/
>>
>> Professor of Statistics and Mathematics
>> University of California
>> 367 Evans Hall # 3860
>> Berkeley, CA 94720-3860
>>
>>
> It's a pity I didn't know to look you up when I was in Berkeley last month
> for the Open Science Summit.
>
>  How do we get through to librarians? Because they have the network and the
> resources and the implicit power to solve this in months. I've tried
> everything. I've cajoled, built systems, ranted, etc. The normal response is
> total apathy. I am particularly appalled by those who say that they can't do
> anything. And then there is a small fringe who attack me.
>
> There is all this money going into Institutional repositories. That's
> potentially an ideal place to work for collecting bibliography. Do they have
> a bibliography of the stuff they've got in there? The academics own papers?
> They SHOULD have. I bet most of them haven't. My grants are topsliced to pay
> for libraries.I'd like to see some public return.
>
> But I will be castigated for attacking libraries.
>
> We *can* do it without libraries. It's much more work. It'll be messy.
>
> But I am continuing with this. The Green Chain Reaction is mainstream.
>
> P.
>
>
> C;lever
>
> --
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069
>
> ------------------------------
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
> Find out more about Talis at http://www.talis.com/
> shared innovation™
>
> Any views or personal opinions expressed within this email may not be those
> of Talis Information Ltd or its employees. The content of this email message
> and any files that may be attached are confidential, and for the usage of
> the intended recipient only. If you are not the intended recipient, then
> please return this message to the sender and delete it. Any use of this
> e-mail by an unauthorised recipient is prohibited.
>
> Talis Information Ltd is a member of the Talis Group of companies and is
> registered in England No 3638278 with its registered office at Knights
> Court, Solihull Parkway, Birmingham Business Park, B37 7YB.
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-bibliography/attachments/20100817/e12a3b01/attachment-0001.html>