[open-bibliography] comprehensive bibliographic database of "open" resources?

[Ross Singer]

On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:

>  Ross Singer writes
>
> > Yes, no doubt that would be both politically savvy on the part of the
> > library
>
>   I don't see how this would be savvy for them.
>
> My sarcasm tag was inadvertently left out.


> > Do bibliographies generally include abstracts?
>
>   Some do and some don't. DBLP for example has none, RePEc
>  mostly has them.
>
> So by "bibliographies", are we referring to "A&I databases"?

-Ross.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-bibliography/attachments/20100817/485699c2/attachment-0001.html>