[open-bibliography] Draft development vocabulary for bibliographic metadata

[Karen Coyle]

Quoting William Waites <william.waites at okfn.org>:


>
> As it is, it looks like a MARC record at a minimum consists in:
>
>     * one xyz:Manifestation
>           o one dc:publisher
>     * one (implied) xyz:Work
>           o one or more dc:contributor (or sub-properties like author,
>             translator, etc)
>           o one or more identifiers, bibo:isbn bibo:issn etc
>           o one or more dc:subject from a controlled vocabulary


William, I'm not quite sure what your "at a minimum" represents, so  
this answer may or may not fit your use case.... however, MARC doesn't  
actually have required fields, but most systems do make a small set  
mandatory. Most of the required ones are in the 00X range, and many of  
those are administrative data. Of the variable fields, the only one  
that I have seen as mandatory is the title (245). That would be the  
manifestation title.

In case you haven't seen this, there are statistics on the actual  
field usage at:

http://www.mcdu.unt.edu/?p=45

I also want to note that some of the more useful data comes out of the  
Leader and the 008 fields (resource type, date of publication,  
language).

kc

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle at kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
ph: 1-510-540-7596
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet