[open-bibliography] introduction

[Jonathan Gray]

Just to follow up from this -- I understand that the libraries
involved in Europeana are in final stages of negotiating licensing
terms. Any evidence or arguments about why Europeana should make the
bibliographic metadata *open* (as in opendefinition.org) would be very
much appreciated! In particular I understand that many libraries
currently want to release with NC restrictions.

Jonathan

On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Patrick Peiffer
<peiffer.patrick at gmail.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
> allow me to introduce myself (thanks to jonathan gray for inviting me)
> i work at the national library of luxembourg (www.bnl.lu) where I
> manage the national consortium for scientific information
> (www.portail.bnl.lu, www.consortium.lu). In the Europeana Connect project
> i'm work package leader "licensing", drafting the agreements for partners
> (libraries, museums, archives, a/v archives) and end users. Non-profit wise
> I am project lead for CC Luxembourg.
> My main interest here: moving forward the liberal licensing of metadata by
> providing tangible examples of its benefits.
> Best,
> Patrick Peiffer
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-bibliography mailing list
> open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography
>
>



-- 
Jonathan Gray

Community Coordinator
The Open Knowledge Foundation
http://blog.okfn.org

http://twitter.com/jwyg
http://identi.ca/jwyg