[open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography

[Deliot, Corine]

Richard

I've investigated this issue. As William points out, this has to do with the source data, not the RDF/XML representation or the conversion.

The record you found was created prior to publication for the British National Bibliography (BNB), on the assumption that it would be published in the UK and would be part of the Library's legal deposit intake. It may worth pointing out that records created prior to publication, on the basis of information provided by the publisher, sometimes contain inaccurate data.

The item was however published in the United States and was ineligible for the BNB. The BL subsequently purchased this item; this has been catalogued and correctly attributed. When I searched our "Search our catalogue" under the title "Presenting XML", your book was the first hit.
http://searchbeta.bl.uk/

We will take steps to delete the incorrect record from our catalogue but it will remain in our rdf/xml dataset until we update this data. William may want to delete it from his version of our data set. 

Hope this helps. 

Corine

*********************************
Corine Deliot
Metadata Standards Analyst
The British Library
Boston Spa, Wetherby
West Yorkshire LS23 7BQ
e-mail: corine.deliot at bl.uk
*********************************

-----Original Message-----
From: open-bibliography-bounces at lists.okfn.org [mailto:open-bibliography-bounces at lists.okfn.org] On Behalf Of Richard Light
Sent: 2010-11-22 17:34
To: Peter Murray-Rust
Cc: public-lod at w3.org; William Waites; List for Working Group on Open Bibliographic Data; public-xg-lld at w3.org
Subject: Re: [open-bibliography] ANN: British National Bibliography

In message 
<AANLkTik=wVZxFoV7=Ro6UM68+cE8_V-ZHPravxKTnBzH at mail.gmail.com>, Peter 
Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> writes
>
>
>On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Richard Light <
>richard at light.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>  But is it reliable?  I looked up the book I wrote (Presenting XML, SAMS
>  Net, 1997) and find that it claims it was written by Laura Alschuler.
>  How did that happen?
>
>Richard - we all expect errors in the Bibliography and it's a brave venture
>by the BL to put it out. I expect that it will be a data entry error at some
>stage in the past. the important thing is to develop a culture where the
>identification of errors is welcomed. 

Absolutely, though lets hope it's a random error and not something 
systematic.  I went to download the file in question to have a look, but 
as it's a 450MB XML document, which Firefox is gallantly trying to load 
for me to read, I suspect I will fail.  Any chance of these resources 
being offered as zip files?

Richard
-- 
Richard Light

_______________________________________________
open-bibliography mailing list
open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography

**************************************************************************
Experience the British Library online at http://www.bl.uk/
 
The British Library’s new interactive Annual Report and Accounts 2009/10 : http://www.bl.uk/knowledge
 
Help the British Library conserve the world's knowledge. Adopt a Book. http://www.bl.uk/adoptabook
 
The Library's St Pancras site is WiFi - enabled
 
*************************************************************************
 
The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended for the addressee(s) only. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this e-mail and notify the mailto:postmaster at bl.uk : The contents of this e-mail must not be disclosed or copied without the sender's consent.
 
The statements and opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the British Library. The British Library does not take any responsibility for the views of the author.
 
*************************************************************************
 Think before you print