[open-bibliography] (Final?) discussion of the openbiblio principles

[William Waites]

As I mentioned the other day in IRC to Rufus, my only comment is that
the strong anti-copyleft position might not be the best. Public domain
terms might be appropriate for large institutions, particularly state
funded ones, but small independently funded organisations that improve
data should be able to prevent their work from being enclosed by the
likes of Amazon and still be able to call their data Open.

-w

* [2011-01-06 09:26:45 +0100] Adrian Pohl <adrian.pohl at okfn.org> écrit:

] Hello,
] 
] as decided in the last meeting[1] we want to get the openbiblio
] principles towards an agreed upon document until January 11th which is
] next Tuesday. I've already made some more changes on the google doc
] and added comments to the document to initiate further discussion, see
] http://bit.ly/gIfB11
] 
] I'm looking forward to your thoughts and comments.
] 
] Adrian
] 
] [1] http://openbiblio.net/2011/01/05/minutes-7th-virtual-meeting-of-the-okfn-openbiblio-group/
] 
] _______________________________________________
] open-bibliography mailing list
] open-bibliography at lists.okfn.org
] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-bibliography

-- 
William Waites                <mailto:ww at styx.org>
http://eris.okfn.org/ww/         <sip:ww at styx.org>
9C7E F636 52F6 1004 E40A  E565 98E3 BBF3 8320 7664