[open-bibliography] [okfn-discuss] Permission request (license)

Sun Nov 3 14:21:13 UTC 2013

I did not originally start the repo, I think it was Rufus. I am not saying
he chose that license, but it may just have been put in there at the start
at some point - I do not believe there is an ideology behind it being
there. I usually use MIT or copyheart. As I did probably write most of the
code, I would be happy to change the licence to MIT if that is helpful at
this stage. If anyone is against this, please say so this week. (I have
copied this mail to the old open-bibliography and openbiblio-dev lists too,
in case anyone on there has an opinion.)

Mark

On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 12:36 PM, François Boulogne <fboulogne at sciunto.org>wrote:

> Le 03/11/2013 07:31, William Waites a écrit :
> >     > give these rights and grant them to you.
> >
> > LGPL for a library and not BSD, right?
> >
> >
>
> I switched to LGPL. LGPL is fine for me, and I prefer FSF's licenses.
>
> --
> François Boulogne.
> http://www.sciunto.org
> GPG fingerprint: 25F6 C971 4875 A6C1 EDD1  75C8 1AA7 216E 32D5 F22F
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-bibliography/attachments/20131103/983f1cef/attachment.html>