[Open-data-census] Comments bug now fixed

• Previous message: [Open-data-census] [CLARIFICATION REQUIRED] Can PSI Licence be considered an "open" license?
• Next message: [Open-data-census] [od-discuss] [CLARIFICATION REQUIRED] Can PSI Licence be considered an "open" license?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dear all Country Editors,

We are pleased to say that the bug in the review system, which prevented
reviewers from amending comments to queued submissions, has now been fixed.
So all those of you who have been meaning to add your comments can now do
so!

-Christian

-- 

Christian Villum

Community Manager, Open Government Data + Local Groups Network
skype: christianvillum  |  @villum <http://www.twitter.com/villum>
The Open Knowledge Foundation <http://okfn.org/>
*Empowering through Open Knowledge
*http://okfn.org/  |  @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN>  |  OKF on
Facebook<https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> |
Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/>  |  Newsletter<http://okfn.org/about/newsletter>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-data-census/attachments/20131009/2e8ac776/attachment-0001.htm>

• Previous message: [Open-data-census] [CLARIFICATION REQUIRED] Can PSI Licence be considered an "open" license?
• Next message: [Open-data-census] [od-discuss] [CLARIFICATION REQUIRED] Can PSI Licence be considered an "open" license?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]