[Open-data-census] [od-discuss] [CLARIFICATION REQUIRED] Can PSI Licence be considered an "open" license?

[Ton Zijlstra]

Indeed. Charging has no bearing on the openness of a license. On openness
yes, but not license. Imo
Op 10 okt. 2013 08:41 schreef "Luis Villa" <luis at lu.is>:

>
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Andrew Stott <andrew.stott at dirdigeng.com>wrote:
>
>> 6.1(1)(b) (which allows the Licensor to charge, for goodness sake)
>
>
> Perhaps I'm missing something (it is late here) but Licensors are always
> allowed to charge, either as parallel distribution/dual-licensing (since
> they are the Licensor/author), or simply as a condition of the initial
> distribution, no?
>
> Relevant OKD section: "The license shall not restrict any party from
> *selling* or giving away the work".
>
> Luis
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-data-census/attachments/20131010/cd2f9eab/attachment.htm>