[Open-data-census] Penalty for no bulk data not appropriate for realtime or big data

[Rufus Pollock]

Yes, please open a separate thread in the forum.

Rufus

On 19 May 2015 at 11:05, Jury Konga <jkonga at sympatico.ca> wrote:

> I agree with both of you.  Stephen I think you’re spot on with your issue
> and Rufus I agree this would be a valuable discussion in the census forum.
>
>
>
> Rufus, I have a more fundamental issue re: current point system versus a %
> openness score (which can accommodate “not applicable” scenarios) – would
> you agree that this is a separate subject for the forum discussion?
>
>
>
> Cheers  Jury
>
>
>
> Local Open Data Census Lead
>
> Open Knowledge Canada
>
>
>
> *From:* open-data-census [mailto:open-data-census-bounces at lists.okfn.org] *On
> Behalf Of *Rufus Pollock
> *Sent:* May-19-15 4:50 AM
> *To:* Stephen Gates
> *Cc:* Open Data Local Census Admins
> *Subject:* Re: [Open-data-census] Penalty for no bulk data not
> appropriate for realtime or big data
>
>
>
> First, this is a great discussion to have - and I have some thoughts I'd
> like to share.
>
>
>
> One procedural point: would you mind posting this on the discuss forum at:
>
>
>
> https://discuss.okfn.org/c/open-data-index
>
>
>
> We're gradually migrating more substantive discussions and thread there
> and this is one that should definitely be there.
>
>
>
> Rufus
>
>
>
> On 19 May 2015 at 06:11, Stephen Gates <stephen.gates at me.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I think the question for bulk data in the census needs to change. It is
> not always possible to publish open data in bulk. As pointed out in the
> open data handbook http://opendatahandbook.org/glossary/en/terms/bulk/
> publishing bulk data is not practical for realtime or big data.
>
>
>
> Can I suggest that the current question is reworded from:
>
>
>
> Is the data available in bulk? - Data is available in bulk if the whole
> dataset can be downloaded easily. It is not available in bulk, if access to
> the data is through a web page that provides access to only part of the
> database.
>
>
>
> to something like:
>
>
>
> Is the data available in bulk or via a real-time feed? - Data is available
> in bulk if the whole dataset can be downloaded easily. It is not available
> in bulk, if access to the data is through a web page that provides access
> to only part of the database. A real-time feed provides access to a subset
> of a database that changes frequently and is too large to download in bulk.
>
>
>
> As an example, in my view, a real-time public transport fed in GTFS-RT
> <https://developers.google.com/transit/gtfs-realtime/> format should not
> be penalised 10 points for not being available in bulk.
>
>
>
>
>
> What do you think? Should the question be changed? If so, what’s the
> process to change it (assuming most census reference the “master” question
> sheet)?
>
>
>
> thanks
>
>
>
> Stephen Gates
> Australia’s Regional Open Data Census <http://australia.census.okfn.org>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-data-census mailing list
> open-data-census at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-data-census
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Rufus Pollock
>
> Founder and President | skype: rufuspollock | @rufuspollock
> <https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>
>
> Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/> - s*ee how data can change the world*
>
> http://okfn.org/ | @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN> | Open Knowledge on
> Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> |  Blog
> <http://blog.okfn.org/>
>



-- 

*Rufus PollockFounder and President | skype: rufuspollock | @rufuspollock
<https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/> - see
how data can change the world**http://okfn.org/ <http://okfn.org/> | @okfn
<http://twitter.com/OKFN> | Open Knowledge on Facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> |  Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/>*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-data-census/attachments/20150519/bee4d748/attachment.html>