[Open-data-census] [Open Knowledge Forums] Penalty for no bulk data not appropriate for realtime or big data

[Rufus Pollock]

On 19 May 2015 at 13:53, Stephen Gates <stephen.gates at me.com> wrote:

> Conversation moved to the new Open Knowledge Forum -
> https://discuss.okfn.org/t/penalty-for-no-bulk-data-not-appropriate-for-realtime-or-big-data/294?u=stephen
>
> It’s very pretty over there. I think we should all move over to the new
> world. What are the plans for directing new conversations to the forum? A
> number of pages on the census and index would need to be updated.
>

I think we should move too - so let's do it. Can you flag where we need to
fix links etc


> From my experience in establishing Australia’s Regional Open Data Census,
> I would have be much less confused if the forum was the place to discuss
> things.
>

Understood and agreed.

Rufus


>
> Stephen Gates
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-data-census mailing list
> open-data-census at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-data-census
>



-- 

*Rufus PollockFounder and President | skype: rufuspollock | @rufuspollock
<https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/> - see
how data can change the world**http://okfn.org/ <http://okfn.org/> | @okfn
<http://twitter.com/OKFN> | Open Knowledge on Facebook
<https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> |  Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/>*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-data-census/attachments/20150519/0ed16fc9/attachment.html>