[Open-education] Open licensing vs Exceptions/Limitations

• Previous message: [Open-education] Fwd: [EIFL-OA] Launch of The Hague Declaration on Knowledge Discovery In The Digital Age
• Next message: [Open-education] [LibOER] Open licensing vs Exceptions/Limitations
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Dear all, regards from Santiago.

Working around a (open) licensing policy for my institution, the Library of
National Congress of Chile, I am being confronted to the following issue:
why should I have a open licensing policy of my content if we have a pool
of exceptions and limitations in our IP law?  Indeed, the last reform to IP
law in Chile recognized a pretty wide range of exceptions and limitations (
http://www.leychile.cl/Navegar?idNorma=28933).

My answer has been:

   - its better to have an instrument that explicits the possible uses,
   instead of interpreting what can or cannot be understood as a limitations
   to copyright
   - the limitations is sort of a catalogue of specific situations, so they
   might be situations not considered in that catalogue, and specially in a
   future perspective, we cannot see yet unpredicted or unexpected situations
   that cannot apply to that catalogue

Surely you have more and better arguments to strengthen the need for a open
licensing policy.  Suggestions or comments?  Thanks for your time,

Werner Westermann
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-education/attachments/20150506/48840382/attachment-0002.html>

• Previous message: [Open-education] Fwd: [EIFL-OA] Launch of The Hague Declaration on Knowledge Discovery In The Digital Age
• Next message: [Open-education] [LibOER] Open licensing vs Exceptions/Limitations
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]