[Open-education] open-education Digest, Vol 57, Issue 6

Sat Apr 21 16:27:17 UTC 2018

All good points. Thanks Wayne.

I shall considering your points before submitting my own comments.

"Some of us" is simply a reference to the multiple conversations I've had
with open advocates, around the world, who like the UNESCO OER definition,
but think it might be improved with a few minor edits.

In the end, of course, the UNESCO Secretariat and UNESCO member states
we'll decide what language they want to use.

Good weekend to all,

Cable

On Sat, Apr 21, 2018, 5:26 AM <open-education-request at lists.okfn.org> wrote:

> Send open-education mailing list submissions to
>         open-education at lists.okfn.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-education
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         open-education-request at lists.okfn.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         open-education-owner at lists.okfn.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of open-education digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: [open-policy-network] UNESCO OER Recommendation: Open for
>       Comment. Deadline: 1 June (Wayne Mackintosh)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 21 Apr 2018 20:33:14 +1200
> From: Wayne Mackintosh <mackintosh.wayne at gmail.com>
> To: Cable Green <cable at creativecommons.org>
> Cc: "OPENEDSIG at JISCMAIL.AC.UK" <OPENEDSIG at jiscmail.ac.uk>, Educause
>         Openness Constituent Group <OPENNESS at listserv.educause.edu>, "Open
>         Educaton @ OKFN" <open-education at lists.okfn.org>, IOL Network
>         <iol-network at googlegroups.com>, OER Advocacy Coalition
>         <oer-advocacy-coalition at googlegroups.com>,
>         "OER-DISCUSS at JISCMAIL.AC.UK" <OER-DISCUSS at jiscmail.ac.uk>, OER
> Forum
>         <oer-forum at lists.esn.org.za>, International OER Advocacy
>         <internationaloeradvocacy at googlegroups.com>, Open Education
> Platform
>         <cc-openedu at googlegroups.com>, Open Policy Network
>         <open-policy-network at googlegroups.com>, CCCOER Advisory
>         <cccoer-advisory at googlegroups.com>, education at lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: Re: [Open-education] [open-policy-network] UNESCO OER
>         Recommendation: Open for Comment. Deadline: 1 June
> Message-ID:
>         <CAEu=
> 25DFK7sH-f0_ZW-6khT3dBB7JXpRi673rwbZpteYw70Q1g at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Cable,
>
> Thanks for sharing the announcement to provide feedback and comment on the
> UNESCO Recommendation on OER. I must compliment the drafting team on
> preparing an exemplary document.
>
> With due respect, based on my experiences of more than two decades working
> in ICTs for development, I disagree with your suggestions in refining the
> definition in the UNESCO draft document. In many cases it is important to
> elaborate on a definition in an international agreement to be more
> inclusive:
>
>
>    - A categorical statement of "digital or otherwise" is of particular
>    importance and significance for learners and decision makers in the
>    developing world. I recommend and support are more inclusive definition
>    which explicitly clarifies that OER includes "otherwise".
>    - I recommend retaining the phrase "with or no limited restrictions" -
>    this is not redundant because it is possible for a copyright holder to
> have
>    the freedom to express the permissions they wish to gift to the world.
>    While Creative Commons is the de facto license I support and use, I
> don't
>    want to deprive anyone from the freedom to use the licenses they choose
>    even if it complicates interoperability. (Creative Commons is not the
> only
>    open content licensing option and it is not UNESCO's role to promote one
>    license brand above another and they should allow the freedom for custom
>    OER licensing.)
>
> For the interests of full disclosure, could you please share openly who the
> "some of us" who have discussed refining the definition are, and why a
> Creative Commons representative is lobbying for "If you agree with this
> recommended edit, please include it in your comments" to an openly
> published consultation?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 21, 2018 at 3:56 AM, Cable Green <cable at creativecommons.org>
> wrote:
>
> > Greetings Open Education Friends,
> >
> >
> >
> > UNESCO is drafting an Open Educational Resources (OER) Recommendation.
> > This is an official UNESCO instrument that will both advise national
> > governments on how to support open education in their countries and
> report
> > on those efforts.
> >
> >
> > The draft Recommendation text has been prepared by a group of open
> > education experts from UNESCO, researchers and practitioners from all
> world
> > regions. The OER Recommendation builds on the Ljubljana OER Action Plan,
> > a product of the 2nd World OER Congress.
> >
> >
> >
> > The online consultation process is now open. This is an invitation to
> > contribute to the draft. In addition to providing your own comments,
> please
> > share this opportunity through your networks.
> >
> >
> > The text is available in English and French:
> >
> >    - https://www.oercongress.org/unesco-oer-recommendation
> >
> >    - https://www.oercongress.org/fr/recommandation-sur-les-rel
> >
> >
> > The deadline for submission of contributions is: 1 June, 2018.
> >
> > ----------
> >
> > Note: Some of us have discussed taking this opportunity to update the
> > UNESCO OER definition. If you agree with this recommended edit, please
> > include it in your comments. I have included detailed*** rationale for
> > the edits below.
> >
> >
> >    - Existing UNESCO OER definition:
> >    - Open Educational Resources (OERs) are teaching, learning and
> >       research materials in any medium ? digital or otherwise ? that
> reside in
> >       the public domain or have been released under an open license that
> permits
> >       no-cost access, use, adaptation and redistribution by others with
> no or
> >       limited restrictions.
> >
> >       - Proposed updated UNESCO OER definition:
> >       - Open Educational Resources (OER) are teaching, learning and
> >       research materials in any medium that reside in the public domain
> or have
> >       been released under an open license that permits no-cost access,
> use,
> >       adaptation and redistribution by others.
> >
> > ----------
> >
> >
> > With gratitude,
> >
> >
> > Cable
> >
> >
> >
> > Cable Green, PhD
> > Director of Open Education
> > Creative Commons
> >
> > @cgreen <http://twitter.com/cgreen>
> > Join: CC Open Education Platform
> > <
> https://creativecommons.org/2017/09/05/invitation-join-cc-open-education-platform/
> >
> > Join the CC Global Network. Get involved today.
> > <https://network.creativecommons.org/get-involved/>
> >
> >
> > ----------
> >
> >
> > ** *Details re: suggested changes to the UNESCO OER definition:
> >
> >
> > (1) Change (OERs) to (OER)
> >
> >
> >    - reason: OER is both singular and plural.
> >
> > (2) remove: "? digital or otherwise ?"
> >
> >
> >    - reason: "digital or otherwise" is redundant with ?in any medium?.
> >    "Any medium" means: text, digital or other formats.
> >
> > (3) remove: "with no or limited restrictions"
> >
> >
> >    - reasons:
> >       - Because all open licenses come with some kind of restriction
> >       (e.g., the requirement to provide attribution); "limited
> restrictions" is
> >       redundant with "open license."
> >       - OER in the public domain has no restrictions. Because the
> >       definition says "public domain" - it is redundant to say "no
> restrictions."
> >    - In addition to being redundant, the phrase "limited restrictions"
> >       implies an author might add additional, custom license
> restrictions on
> >       her/his OER. This is not helpful messaging when the education
> community is
> >       best served by using standard, interoperable (not custom) open
> licenses.
> >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Open Policy Network" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> > email to open-policy-network+unsubscribe at googlegroups.com.
> > To post to this group, send email to
> open-policy-network at googlegroups.com.
> > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/open-policy-network.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Wayne Mackintosh
> Director OER Foundation and OERu facilitator
> UNESCO - ICDE Chair in OER
> Skype: WGMNZ1
> Twitter: Mackiwg
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-education/attachments/20180421/15fe1ddf/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-education mailing list
> open-education at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-education
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of open-education Digest, Vol 57, Issue 6
> *********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-education/attachments/20180421/3fa44f51/attachment-0002.html>