[open-government] Morality checks on OpenData in France fixed in LOPPSI bill

Victoria Anderica victoria at access-info.org
Fri Dec 17 14:24:16 UTC 2010


Dear Benjamin,

Congratulation for this news. It was great to be involved!

Have all very nice holidays!

All the best,

Vicky

Victoria Anderica Caffarena
Project Coordinator
Access Info Europe
Madrid
+34 91 366 53 44
+34 606 592 976
skype: victoria.access-info
http://www.access-info.org/
Síguenos en Twiter, access_info, y en Facebook
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Access-Info-Europe/367870967220


El 17/12/2010 14:26, Benjamin Ooghe-Tabanou escribió:
> Dear everyone,
>
> We're a bit tired having followed (and tweeted) live from the public
> most of the debates on the LOPPSI law at french National Assembly, but
> quite satisfied for the specific subject of OpenData. On an opposite
> note, MP's voted some serious threats to Internet neutrality that
> keeps raising very serious concerns since administrative filtering of
> websites without any intervention of a judge was adopted :
> http://www.laquadrature.net/en/administrative-net-censorship-adopted-in-france-pedophiles-unworried
>
> But regarding OpenData, after our first raises of concerns, multiple
> MP's from all political groups proposed amendments in order to either
> remove, either rewrite properly, the dangerous article 30ter about
> "morality checks" on public data reusers.
> In the end, after the international letter was sent out, the official
> commission that usually settles the votes also decided at the last
> minute to propose an amendment, which was adopted and passed over all
> of the others.
>
> This amendment (number 332 :
> http://www.nosdeputes.fr/amendement/2827/332 ) rewrites the whole
> article 30 ter to define these morality checks specifically on the
> only case that was primarily intended : private personnal data of cars
> immatriculation. Therefore the bill does not refer anymore at all to
> the law of access to information of 1978. We could still argue that
> having such personnal data accessible to commercial marketting
> purposes is condemnable (and may be removed during the last debates at
> the Senate in a couple months) but this does not concern open or
> public data at all anymore.
>
> So cheers and thanks again to everyone who participated in this by
> signing and talking about the open letter !
> Big up to Victoria and Helen from Access Info Europe for their help !
>
> Happy holidays !
>
> Benjamin Ooghe-Tabanou for Regards Citoyens
> http://www.regardscitoyens.org
>
> PS : For french viewers or readers, we've put the video of the debates
> online at the following address : http://vimeo.com/17896937
> The report of the debates can also be read here :
> http://www.nosdeputes.fr/seance/4510#table_12796
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-government/attachments/20101217/757fc20e/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the open-government mailing list