[open-government] Question regarding license issues with mashed up data from several sources using several licenses

[Baden Appleyard]

Hi Martin,

Im not sure if it may be of any assistance, but I have added a licence
chooser tool to the AusGOAL framework here:
http://www.ausgoal.gov.au/licence-chooser .  It may go some way to
addressing your question.  Its not perfect, and we are building a new one
right now,  but its designed to ask some base level questions about what it
is that you are licensing, and helps you identify the chacteristics of
nested material that has different copyright requirements. ie.. What
licence can you choose for your mashup.  It also has the functionality to
deal with a mashup that incorporates nested CC material.. eg... CC-BY
mashed up with CC-BY-NC...

If you are interested, I can let you let you know when the new version is
launched.

Kind regards,

Baden
________________
*Baden M Appleyard*
National Programme Director
Australian Governments Open Access and Licensing Framework (AusGOAL)
Level 18, Mineral House
41 George Street
BRISBANE, QLD, 4001
Map<http://maps.google.com/maps?q=41+George+Street,+Brisbane,+Queensland,+Australia&hl=en&ll=-27.473866,153.026386&spn=0.001299,0.005284&sll=-27.473862,153.026385&sspn=0.000723,0.001321&z=18&layer=c&cbll=-27.473862,153.026385&panoid=iVhPsQeG7SiQfJZY86aqsQ&cbp=11,48.36,,0,3.9>
Phone: +61 (0)7 3405 0377
Mobile: +61 (0)459 824 061
Linkedin: http://au.linkedin.com/in/badenappleyard

AusGOAL
Visit our Website <http://www.ausgoal.gov.au> | Subscribe to our
Blog<http://blog.ausgoal.gov.au> | Join
our LinkedIn Group <http://linkd.in/oq5L3u> | Follow Us on Twitter: @AusGOAL



2012/2/13 Martin Kaltenböck <m.kaltenboeck at semantic-web.at>

> Dear all,
>
> is there any guideline & info / experience available
> when mashing up data & information from several data sources
> that have different licenses / terms of use (no info about this)...
>
> So e.g. when putting together data from A) World Bank (that is free for
> re-use by terms of use),
> B) data.gov.uk (giving the Open Gov Data License - free to re-use by
> attribution)
> as well as C) another source that has a CC license and D) data that I have
> collected
> by myself via e.g. a questionnaire and D) data from a website that
> provides no clear
> terms of use information....
>
> 2 Use Cases to clarify:
>
> A) Publishing mashed up data & info from the given example sources above
> on a website
> called 'MashUp' (just an example title)
> Is it sufficient (legally) to mentioned the sources of every data set? And
> thats it?
>
> B) Providing these 'MashUp' again as a data set for further re-use (as
> e.g. XML or RDF)
> - Is there a guideline that for instance I am allowed to publish a certain
> range of data
> for further re-use without a restriction (as it is e.g. for music) etc.....
>
> Or: is the better approach to mention the original source & the original
> license per part of the
> 'MashUp' data - what could become a huge effort if using lots fo data
> sources....
> or becomes impossible because I have mashed too much and the original
> source becomes
> unable to mention exactly...
>
> Many thanks for support / infos / opinions - all the best - martin
>
>
> --
> Martin Kaltenböck, CMC
> Managing Partner, CFO
>
> Semantic Web Company (SWC)
> Mariahilfer Strasse 70 / 8
> A - 1070 Vienna, Austria
> Tel +43 1 402 12 35 - 25
> Fax +43 1 402 12 35 - 22
> Mobile +43 650 3905697
>
> http://www.semantic-web.at
> http://blog.semantic-web.at
> http://poolparty.biz
>
> LOD2 - Creating Knowledge out of Interlinked Data - http://lod2.eu/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-government mailing list
> open-government at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-government
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-government/attachments/20120214/24fcf0e4/attachment-0001.html>