[open-government] Legal issues of linked data-different from open data?

Fri Nov 2 14:19:02 UTC 2012

Hello Toby,

Thank you for your answer!

That was actually my line of thought when I was reading about linked data. All the examples I found in the web explaining what linked data is always use a "person" and all the interrelations one can get about that certain person when in the web of linked data. With all the data be interlinked, cross-referenced and finally put in context, privacy is at a high risk. For another side, linked data seems to be the best way to publish PSI in a machine readable format, since linked data provides data "in a
regular and well-defined structure," and the most structured the data, the easier
for machines and people to re-use it. 

This seems to be the tendency for the future. So how will we be able to combine those things? ...

Best regards,
María

-----------------
+46 76 231 9427mjpp7 at hotmail.com

Subject: Re: [open-government] Legal issues of linked data-different from open data?
From: toby at law-democracy.org
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 10:44:24 -0300
CC: open-government at lists.okfn.org
To: mjpp7 at hotmail.com

Hi María,
This is complex, and I don't claim to understand all of it
A key issue here relates to the extent to which linking data will raise legal confidentiality issues which do not arise in relation to disaggregated data.
In the area of national security, the mosaic theory has long been put forward (ie before powerful modern possibilities regarding electronically linked data), which says that even if certain pieces of information are not, individually, sensitive from a national security perspective, when you piece them together in the right mosaic, they do become sensitive. With modern linking technologies, we can create vastly more sophisticated mosaics, to continue the metaphor, and so the issue becomes far more 'threatening'. In recent times, I have more often seen the argument raised with respect to privacy (ie by mashing discrete databases you can penetrate through data anonymisation to link personal data to discrete individuals).
>From a legal perspective, public bodies have a right, and in many cases an obligation, to protect sensitive data (for example private data). This extends to protecting interests (like privacy) even in the face of linking possibilities. So, a public body might refuse to release data on the basis that it could be mashed with another data set to reveal private data.
While there is undoubtedly some warrant for concern here, at the same time many openness advocates are suspicious of the wider claims made in this area, just as we have always been about national security based mosaic theories. The few studies I have seen on this are based on data where anonymisation was pretty self-evidently sub-standard. I myself had a discussion about this with a senior officer at Statistics Canada, which is the central government statistical agency which handles, among other things, the central census and holds vast amounts of very sensitive personal data. He indicated to me that they believe that the tools they current employ to anonymise data are robust and that they had never had a data breach through linking.
I'm not sure if this is what you were asking. 
Best wishes, Toby
___________________________________Toby MendelExecutive Director Centre for Law and Democracytoby at law-democracy.orgTel:  +1 902 431-3688Fax: +1 902 431-3689www.law-democracy.org

On 2 Nov 2012, at 09:49, María Täng Palma wrote:Hello,

Would anyone be able to shade some light on to what extent do the legal issues surrounding linked data differ from those of open data?

Thanks,
María

-----------------

mjpp7 at hotmail.com

_______________________________________________
open-government mailing list
open-government at lists.okfn.org
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-government
Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-government

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-government/attachments/20121102/f18408b4/attachment-0001.html>