[open-government] Leapfrogging open government

Josh Tauberer tauberer at govtrack.us
Wed Mar 23 01:04:52 UTC 2016


> we have the chance to t some huge efforts that are currently invested 
> into slow transition towards that. Instead we can focus on the further 
> goal and be a few steps ahead.

If we all stopped doing the things that are achievable today to work 
instead on goals for tomorrow, then we wouldn't ever achieve anything 
and tomorrow would never come.

- Josh Tauberer (@JoshData)

http://razor.occams.info

On 03/22/2016 07:09 PM, Anton Stoychev wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been a member of the mailing list for a while but haven't posted 
> anything so far. My involvement in OGP has been about its 
> implementation in Bulgaria and its capabilities for modernization of 
> the administration.
>
> It would be interesting to know your opinion on a piece of text 
> <https://medium.com/juice-romanian-vitamins/it-s-time-to-have-no-countries-b9c976951f44#.pg2909tc5> 
> about culture, borders and the harm by them 
> <https://medium.com/juice-romanian-vitamins/it-s-time-to-have-no-countries-b9c976951f44#.pg2909tc5>, 
> titled "/It's time to have no countries 
> <https://medium.com/juice-romanian-vitamins/it-s-time-to-have-no-countries-b9c976951f44#.ghv0c9kcm>/". 
> It's closely related to good governance. It is a recent publication, 
> preceding the events in Brussels, so it's not provoked by them. It was 
> provoked by visible progress in the direction described in the article 
> and the reappearing problems in current governance mechanisms.
>
> So. Fantasy / possibility / a-must? How do you find it?
>
> Noticeably, I think the offered is possible and we have the chance to 
> t some huge efforts that are currently invested into slow transition 
> towards that. Instead we can focus on the further goal and be a few 
> steps ahead.
>
> Some provocation and inspiration:
>
>   * Latest news from BitNation <https://bitnation.co/services/> is
>     that they are working on "a decentralised, open source, and
>     pseudonymous dispute resolution chat platform" - a sovereign
>     blockchain jurisdiction
>   * Blockchain application in Smart Contracts
>     <https://smartcontract.com/> (other implementation also exist)
>   * Updates from the Venus project
>     <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jl7Yq8QbPns>
>   * Progress in smart cities' research
>   * Frustration in travelling and being an expat
>   * Propaganda increase, say even presidential rallies
>   * Honor/trust-based startups
>     <https://www.facebook.com/ajplusenglish/videos/698445160296994/?pnref=story>
>   * "The software told me so" - the ecosystem of smart apps, fintech
>     startups working around banking monopoly and the increasing amount
>     of open source projects from businesses create a demand for a
>     collaborative way of remote/online decision making, so sooner or
>     later such will exist
>
> There were some nice discussions over the social networks. I think 
> this is a good place to look for opinions as well.
>
> Kind Regards,
> *Anton Stoychev*
> *
> *
> /Creating a better way to understand ____ via design and technology/
> *
> *
> ​web:
> www.obshtestvo.bg <http://www.obshtestvo.bg/>
>
> tel: (+40) 073 523 0801 <tel:040735230801>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-government mailing list
> open-government at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-government
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-government

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-government/attachments/20160322/1fd640fc/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the open-government mailing list