[open-humanities] Recent discussion about web-based annotation software/services
Derek DiMatteo
derek.dimatteo at gmail.com
Tue May 12 17:03:10 UTC 2015
Hi all,
I just came across this article, which mentions several textual
annotation projects, but does not mention any from OKFN. I thought it
might be interesting to see what else is going on, and to see whether
you all might see opportunities for collaboration or at least promotion.
http://chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/how-do-you-annotate-in-your-class/60101
Best,
Derek
On 4/17/2015 3:21 AM, open-humanities-request at lists.okfn.org wrote:
> Send open-humanities mailing list submissions to
> open-humanities at lists.okfn.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-humanities
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> open-humanities-request at lists.okfn.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> open-humanities-owner at lists.okfn.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of open-humanities digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: OpenLiterature v1.0 - let's do a reboot! (Rufus Pollock)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:20:09 +0200
> From: Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
> To: A list for people interested in the use of open source tools and
> open access in humanities teaching and research
> <open-humanities at lists.okfn.org>, Seth Woodworth <seth at sethish.com>
> Subject: Re: [open-humanities] OpenLiterature v1.0 - let's do a
> reboot!
> Message-ID:
> <CAKssCpPbf8qT7ZAsRn9Rvdu81tte9xMx7WiMZmzjSCATNE5BfA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Seth,
>
> Wanted to check you got the last response here :-) It would be great to
> continue the thread as I think there is great potential here at multiple
> possible levels of collaboration (from very basic to more extensive).
>
> Rufus
>
> On 25 February 2015 at 12:12, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org> wrote:
>
>> On 23 February 2015 at 14:55, Seth Woodworth <seth at sethish.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I have a project where I have forked Project Gutenberg to Github (
>>> https://gitenberg.github.io/). On Github we are starting to
>>> collectively improve the copyediting and formatting of PG books. We are
>>> likely going to be using asciidoc as our base markup format document.
>>>
>>> I would love it if OpenLiterature editors/contributors could make
>>> copy-edits or formatting edits in GITenberg and have the change end up on
>>> OpenLiterature. I think there are tangible benefits to basing on top of
>>> GITenberg, having a source git commit to be able to point to to denote your
>>> text document version would be useful alone.
>>>
>> I think there could be real synergies here. e.g. if GITenberg started
>> storing texts as Textus structure (and perhaps as Data Packages) that could
>> be the raw source for OpenLiterature. This not only builds on our original
>> approach for OpenShakespeare where we had texts in git, but also on the
>> recent work with "data" Data Packages both for Core Datasets project
>> <http://okfnlabs.org/blog/2015/01/03/data-curators-wanted-for-core-datasets.html> and
>> the storage and micro-services approach for OpenSpending
>> <http://labs.openspending.org/osep/01-approach-and-architecture-of-openspending.html> (in
>> OpenSpending we now store data as Budget Data Packages on s3).
>>
>> So basically GITenberg could become the core raw text repo that powers
>> OpenLiterature.
>>
>> Is this of interest to the OpenLiterature folks?
>> Very much so IMO as per above.
>>
>> Rufus
>>
>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 4:34 AM, James Harriman-Smith <
>>> james.harriman-smith at cantab.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good points Iain. And it'd be great if you could give a little time to
>>>> this once you've made it through those deadlines.
>>>>
>>>> To carry on the discussion, with a bit of reprise for those joining us
>>>> here. My suggested MVP was:
>>>>
>>>> Agreed by Iain:
>>>> 1. Upload of texts in a simple format, ideally one used on Gutenberg
>>>> 2. Allow those texts to be annotated by users publicly
>>>>
>>>> Questioned:
>>>> 3. Make annotations and texts searchable
>>>>
>>>> I think #3 is very important: it would allow someone to use the platform
>>>> for research far more effectively. I, for instance, often find myself
>>>> looking for ideas in my notes, jotted down in response to a passage, and no
>>>> longer remembering the phrase that triggered my idea.
>>>>
>>>> That said, I don't think #3 is essential. Open Literature can be
>>>> demonstrated without it, and will still be useful. What do others think
>>>> here?
>>>>
>>>> J
>>>>
>>>> On 23 February 2015 at 09:51, Iain Emsley <iainemsley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> @rufus , +1 for the reminder and enthusiasm :)
>>>>>
>>>>> @james: a discussion of the minimal viable product would be useful to
>>>>> provide a goal. Is #3, the search a first to do, or a rapid second? Whilst
>>>>> I agree that it is necessary, do we need it initially? #2 is the part where
>>>>> my earlier effort stalled in terms of integrating the existing JS and
>>>>> Wordpress.
>>>>>
>>>>> As with others, I'm tied up at the moment but _should_ have more time
>>>>> at the end of next month when some deadlines have passed by.
>>>>>
>>>>> Iain
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 7:32 AM, James Harriman-Smith <
>>>>> james.harriman-smith at okfn.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear list, Rufus, John,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @John: it's great to see some maintenance on the Open Humanities
>>>>>> collection of websites happening, and a wiki booted for our activities.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> @Rufus, all: it's true that Open Literature has gone dormant of late,
>>>>>> and definitely needs a reboot. I'm afraid that, like John though, I don't
>>>>>> have time to give at the moment, as I'm writing up my thesis and trying to
>>>>>> secure some kind of paid academic employment for next year.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That said, I think we could at least email about the minimum viable
>>>>>> product for Open Literature, to know what we have to do when we all have a
>>>>>> little more time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll start that in my next mail.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> J
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 16 February 2015 at 09:19, Rufus Pollock <rufus.pollock at okfn.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 15 February 2015 at 15:10, John Levin <john at anterotesis.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regret I have very limited time - and am out of the UK - at the
>>>>>>>> moment. In any case it seems that the work to be done is mainly technical,
>>>>>>>> coding, at this point. Once Textus is up and running, then the non-techie
>>>>>>>> humanists can get stuck in, putting up texts etc.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would say there is need right now for a lot of *non*-techincal
>>>>>>> engagement - from being site editor, to blogging, tweeting, writing new
>>>>>>> essays, doing user testing, coordinating, organizing events. So would
>>>>>>> definitely welcome non-technical folks here :-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> A couple of side-matters:
>>>>>>>> 1: Is this the OL twitter account? https://twitter.com/
>>>>>>>> OpenLiterature Is anyone looking after it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No - but we could (i also wonder if we should move over
>>>>>>> OpenShakespeare to here since it already has quite a few followers)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2: I have cleared spam and pending spam from the OL & Open Hums
>>>>>>>> wordpress sites.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Amazing!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3: Fixed the links in this post:
>>>>>>>> http://openliterature.net/2011/09/05/shakespeare-and-the-internet/
>>>>>>>> which were directing to Open Shakespeare & 404ing.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fantastic - and thanks!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rufus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 15/02/2015 14:39, Rufus Pollock wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I wanted to restart the conversation on getting OpenLiterature v1.0
>>>>>>>>> launched. In terms of key steps:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. Identify the minimal viable product for OpenLiterature.net
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This also relates to minimal viable "Textus" platform to power this
>>>>>>>>> (for
>>>>>>>>> background and slide deck see http://okfnlabs.org/textus/). At
>>>>>>>>> present
>>>>>>>>> the key things would be finishing the viewer JS lib (we are 80%
>>>>>>>>> there)
>>>>>>>>> and integrating this into the wordpress site.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Requirement: a discussion on this list
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> We already have an issue list
>>>>>>>>> <https://github.com/okfn/openliterature.net/issues> that could be
>>>>>>>>> useful
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2. Estimate work and skills needed
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> My guess is we are talking about 3-6 person weeks here to get to
>>>>>>>>> MVP -
>>>>>>>>> though we would need to properly estimate.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3. Recruit team
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Anticipate roles like:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - Product Owner
>>>>>>>>> - Cat herder (scrum master)
>>>>>>>>> - Site Editor
>>>>>>>>> - Designer
>>>>>>>>> - Frontend JS (viewer)
>>>>>>>>> - Wordpress Plugin write (PHP)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Probably work asynchronously around a series of sprints (e.g. a few
>>>>>>>>> weekend or Saturday sprints)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Who's interested? In particular, who would be interested in
>>>>>>>>> coordinating
>>>>>>>>> the initial phase of getting us all moving again?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rufus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> John Levin
>>>>>>>> http://www.anterotesis.com
>>>>>>>> http://twitter.com/anterotesis
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> open-humanities mailing list
>>>>>>>> open-humanities at lists.okfn.org
>>>>>>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-humanities
>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-humanities
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *Rufus PollockFounder and President | skype: rufuspollock |
>>>>>>> @rufuspollock <https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>Open Knowledge
>>>>>>> <http://okfn.org/> - see how data can change the world**http://okfn.org/
>>>>>>> <http://okfn.org/> | @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN> | Open Knowledge on
>>>>>>> Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> | Blog
>>>>>>> <http://blog.okfn.org/>*
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The Open Knowledge Foundation is a not-for-profit organisation. It
>>>>>>> is incorporated in England & Wales as a company limited by guarantee, with
>>>>>>> company number 05133759. VAT Registration ? GB 984404989. Registered
>>>>>>> office address: Open Knowledge Foundation, St John?s Innovation Centre,
>>>>>>> Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WS, UK.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> open-humanities mailing list
>>>>>>> open-humanities at lists.okfn.org
>>>>>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-humanities
>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-humanities
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> James Harriman-Smith
>>>>>> Open Literature Working Group Coordinator
>>>>>> Open Knowledge Foundation
>>>>>> http://okfn.org/members/jameshs
>>>>>> Skype: james.harriman.smith
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> open-humanities mailing list
>>>>>> open-humanities at lists.okfn.org
>>>>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-humanities
>>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-humanities
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> open-humanities mailing list
>>>>> open-humanities at lists.okfn.org
>>>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-humanities
>>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-humanities
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> James Harriman-Smith
>>>> Ph.D. Candidate, English Faculty
>>>> Peterhouse
>>>> University of Cambridge
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> open-humanities mailing list
>>>> open-humanities at lists.okfn.org
>>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-humanities
>>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-humanities
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> open-humanities mailing list
>>> open-humanities at lists.okfn.org
>>> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-humanities
>>> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-humanities
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> *Rufus PollockFounder and President | skype: rufuspollock | @rufuspollock
>> <https://twitter.com/rufuspollock>Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/> - see
>> how data can change the world**http://okfn.org/ <http://okfn.org/> |
>> @okfn <http://twitter.com/OKFN> | Open Knowledge on Facebook
>> <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> | Blog <http://blog.okfn.org/>*
>>
>> The Open Knowledge Foundation is a not-for-profit organisation. It is
>> incorporated in England & Wales as a company limited by guarantee, with
>> company number 05133759. VAT Registration ? GB 984404989. Registered
>> office address: Open Knowledge Foundation, St John?s Innovation Centre,
>> Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WS, UK.
>>
>
>
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
More information about the open-humanities
mailing list