[open-linguistics] META-NET Data Liberation Campaign

Wed Dec 5 20:20:49 UTC 2012

On 5 December 2012 19:03, Nancy Ide <ide at cs.vassar.edu> wrote:
>
> On Dec 5, 2012, at 1:22 PM, "Jimmy O'Regan" <joregan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Describing copyleft/share-alike licences as 'not suitable for
> commercial use' is a nice tagline, but it's patently false
>
>
> My exact statement was "often not suitable for commercial use", for the
> reasons you point out.
>

The presence or absence of 'often' does not make your statement any
less false. You are still conflating 'commercial use' with 'the
preparation of proprietary derivatives'.

-- 
<Sefam> Are any of the mentors around?
<jimregan> yes, they're the ones trolling you