[open-linguistics] Project note in Language Resources and Evaluation

[Steven Moran]

Hi,

I can contribute as well. It seems the two go hand-in-hand, or?
Getting people to join OWLG should be one goal of OWLG, but access to
data for many researchers will be the motivating factor. I think both
should be discussed.

What is the time line? My feeling is that the LLOD will be a lot
closer to a reality (and not just an image) by the end of September
when we have the MLODE workshop. Some nice use cases will likely also
come out of the workshop, which may be of interest to both linguists
and businesses.

Best,

-Steve


On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Sebastian Nordhoff
<sebastian_nordhoff at eva.mpg.de> wrote:
> Dear all,
> at the last telco[1], we discussed publishing a "project note" in Language
> Resources and Evaluation[2]. A project note is different from a scientific
> article in the sense that it is not necessary to present original research.
> The length should not exceed 8 pages.
> Jonathan Pool and I will take the lead for this publication. Sebastian
> Hellmann has kindly agreed to set up an SVN.
> One fundamental issue which we did not touch upon during the telco was the
> scope: would the project note be about the OWLG, or about the LLOD cloud?
> Please let me know whether you would like to contribute to this project
> note, and which of the two options you would prefer
> Best wishes
> Sebastian
>
>
>
>
> [1] http://wiki.okfn.org/Wg/linguistics/minutes/20120723#Future_Publications
> [2] http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/linguistics/journal/10579
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-linguistics mailing list
> open-linguistics at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-linguistics