[open-linguistics] Linguistic relevance
pool at panlex.org
Tue Feb 24 15:50:06 UTC 2015
>> As a thought, could we find criteria for all three? E.g. does mere usage
>> in Language Technology qualify?
> I think it should, also because certain "non-linguistic" resources would be
> ruled out otherwise. The DBpedia falls into this category
Doesn't this create a risk that any resource linked to DBpedia is included, even if it is linked to elements of DBpedia that, alone, would not be classified as a linguistic resource?
> Actually, Jonathan provided a definition that nay be used for separating
> "content" from "intention" by distinguishing language resources and
> linguistic resources ("suggestion 4" in the wiki) -- if I understand your
> ideas about content correctly ;)
I think you have. As you noted previously, any content definition may need revision in order to have a benign extension.
More information about the open-linguistics