[open-literature] Open Correspondence - changes and developments

[print.crimes]

I was thinking more of the data structures for the endpoints.

Iain
On 05/11/2010 11:57, Rufus Pollock wrote:
> On 4 November 2010 16:49, print.crimes<print.crimes at yatterings.com>  wrote:
> [...]
>
>> Storage
>>
>> As per the okfn-discussion and earlier emails, I think that the site needs
>> to store the endpoint data in something like Couch. Rufus, I know that we've
>> mooted it but are there any issues for the server doing this? It might help
>> with getting the timeline loading a little more quickly. Could we use
>> something like GeoCouch should it be suitable for the geographical data?
>> (I've yet to play around with it or the data so just mooting at the moment.)
> By storage do you mean for the data structures or for the raw letters
> themselves (or both)?
>
> I'm not sure we need couch here if we just want to store the texts
> (just use s3 or any other backends supported by OFS [1])
>
> Rufus
>
> [1]: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ofs/
>
>