No subject


Sun Dec 12 18:29:16 GMT 2010


surmise that the NCBI taxonomy, presumably with a bias toward human<br>
and model organisms, as well as its adoption by Uniprot, should be the<br>
preferred choice for expressing taxon info in the context of<br>
biomedical knowledge?<br>
<br>
Next question (thinking that I know the answer) is how to integrate<br>
datasets that use one of each: NCBI and Darwin? Of course, we can<br>
shelve this and come back to it some other year, if we want to dig<br>
into something more specifically biomedical. The issue will eventually<br>
come back to haunt us in any case. For example, with chemical<br>
identifiers..<br>
<br>
Also, is taxon out of scope for Identifier.org ?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Scott<br><br>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<br>[Jerven]<br>Hi All,<br>
<br>
Don&#39;t wish to spam the mailing list about which taxonomy to use. Howeve=
r
 if you actually look at the darwin and uniprot taxonomy &quot;schema&quot;=
 then=20
they are very similar. And even in the taxonomy world it doesn&#39;t have=
=20
that many controversies.<br>
<br>
Its the instances that get hairy.<br>
i.e. is it<br>
<br>
Dugu is a rodentia<br>
&lt;<a href=3D"http://purl.uniprot.org/taxonomy/10160" target=3D"_blank">pu=
rl.uniprot.org/taxonomy/10160</a>&gt; rdfs:subClassOf &lt;<a href=3D"http:/=
/purl.uniprot.org/taxonomy/9989" target=3D"_blank">purl.uniprot.org/taxonom=
y/9989</a>&gt;<br>



or<br>
Dugu is a Caviomorpha<br>
&lt;<a href=3D"http://purl.uniprot.org/taxonomy/10160" target=3D"_blank">pu=
rl.uniprot.org/taxonomy/10160</a>&gt; rdfs:subClassOf &lt;<a href=3D"http:/=
/dbpedia.org/resource/Caviomorpha" target=3D"_blank">http://dbpedia.org/res=
ource/Caviomorpha</a>&gt;<br>



<br>
Which gets taxonomist all exited :)<br>
<br>
Mapping schemas is easy to do here. Its mapping instances that get the feud=
s started :D<br>
<br>
Regards,<br><font color=3D"#888888">
Jerven</font><br><br>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D<br>PMR comment - this isn&#39;t spam, it&#39;s science!<br>=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D<br>PMR - thanks for this. If =
we can make progress on identifiers it makes *me* happy!<span class=3D"HOEn=
Zb"><font color=3D"#888888"><br>


-- <br>Peter Murray-Rust<br>Reader in Molecular Informatics<br>Unilever Cen=
tre, Dep. Of Chemistry<br>University of Cambridge<br>CB2 1EW, UK<br><a href=
=3D"tel:%2B44-1223-763069" value=3D"+441223763069" target=3D"_blank">+44-12=
23-763069</a><br>


</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
open-science mailing list<br>
<a href=3D"mailto:open-science at lists.okfn.org">open-science at lists.okfn.org<=
/a><br>
<a href=3D"http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science" target=3D"_=
blank">http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science</a><br>
<br></div><br>

--f46d043891018704e804b326e88b--



More information about the open-science-dev mailing list