[open-science] OKF: What shall I say at the Open Science Summit in Berkeley

[Bill Hooker]

http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1362040

I've been carrying this around in my backpack for a while now and
reading in bits and pieces on the train etc.  Well worth the effort.

B.



On Tue, 06 Jul 2010 12:36 -0700, "wilbanks at creativecommons.org"
<wilbanks at creativecommons.org> wrote:
> Victoria stodden has put years of work into this; I would encourage you
> to look at her reproducible research standard proposal...on mobile so no
> links, but easy to Google.
> 
> ----- Reply message -----
> From: "Cameron Neylon" <cameron.neylon at stfc.ac.uk>
> Date: Tue, Jul 6, 2010 12:30
> Subject: [open-science] OKF: What shall I say at the Open Science Summit
> in Berkeley
> To: "Jonathan Gray" <jonathan.gray at okfn.org>, "Peter Murray-Rust"
> <pm286 at cam.ac.uk>
> Cc: <open-science at lists.okfn.org>
> 
> 
> I like this idea a lot. Could I make a suggestion that the fifth one,
> rather
> than being advocacy should be to make physical materials available?
> Creative
> Commons have done a lot of work recently on generic MTAs in an effort to
> make sharing physical materials as easy and consistent as data and code.
> Advocacy for me is the centre of the flower and the five petals Open
> Data,
> Open access papers/communication, Open Code, Open process, Open
> Materials.
> 
> I am giving a similar 10 minutes at the summit (I think on the same panel
> as
> Peter?) and was intending to focus on process as the area that has
> received
> the least work and has the weakest framework to build on in my view.
> 
> So for instance we can say as criteria:
> 
> Data -> PP
> OA -> SPARC OA Seal, CC-BY
> Code -> OSI compliant
> Materials -> CC-MTA (actually I'm unsure what level should be recommended
> here)
> 
> Process -> ? We don't really have equivalents beyond Jean-Claude's
> delayed/non-delayed and full record/partial record ONS claims
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Cameron
> 
> 
> On 06/07/2010 20:06, "Jonathan Gray" <jonathan.gray at okfn.org> wrote:
> 
> > That would be great. Think its crucial to have *very* clear criteria
> > for the petals -- so binary Y/N question is easy to answer (e.g. PP
> > compliant? OSI compliant? 'Libre' OA? ...)
> > 
> > J.
> > 
> > On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> >> Thanks J
> >> 
> >> On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Jonathan Gray <jonathan.gray at okfn.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> The 10 ideas for opening up scientific data is a great idea. Perhaps
> >>> we could start a pad to iterate on this?
> >>> 
> >>> 5 ideas for starters:
> >>> 
> >>>  * Data: Open up your research data in accordance with the Panton
> >>> Principles.
> >>>  * Publications: Deposit your publications in an open access
> >>> repository -- or publish in open access journal. Ideally under an open
> >>> license (such as Creative Commons Attribution).
> >>>  * Code: Make software available under an open source license.
> >>>  * Process: Let others know what you're doing: whether via a blog,
> >>> public mailing lists, or social networking sites.
> >>>  * Advocacy: Encourage students, researchers and colleagues to do the
> >>> same!
> >>> 
> >> If we stick with 4 or 5 we could have a logo (e.g. a flower) with  petals
> >> each with a letter on. Then people could publish this flower with the petals
> >> coloured in for each thing they have done. Rather liike the Geek code or
> >> Stackoverflow badges.
> >> 
> >> We should also have very simple things people can do - like adding open data
> >> stickers to their blog, etc. We need to have the resources that they point
> >> to when clicked.
> >> 
> >> 
> >>> P.
> >> 
> >> 
> >> --
> >> Peter Murray-Rust
> >> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> >> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> >> University of Cambridge
> >> CB2 1EW, UK
> >> +44-1223-763069
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Scanned by iCritical.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> 
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
>