[open-science] Panton Papers

[Cameron Neylon]

> 
> It may be premature but if each PantonPaper is a nucleus for discussion and
> future drafting, maybe we need a resource for each (pad, wiki?).

Ultimately (and perhaps quite soon) I would agree. The current pad is a good
start though I think. My feeling is that the high level ideas/subjects will
also need some working out before splitting into separate documents. But
once it¹s clear what those will be I think splitting and dividing up the
work would be a good strategy.

Cheers

Cameron
>> 


-- 
Scanned by iCritical.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20100727/ff5845f8/attachment-0001.html>