[open-science] Open Science Data Image/Visualisation

[Peter Murray-Rust]

On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Jenny Molloy <jenny.molloy at okfn.org> wrote:

> Hi All
>
> Another request re: the PLoS profile - does anybody know of a nice
> visualisation either of or made using open science data? It would be
> good to have an illustration to break up the text.
> Thanks a lot!
>
> We have visualisations created from analysing the 200,000 independent data
in http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/crystaleye - see
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v451/n7179/full/451648a.html Figure 2.
Crystaleye is completely Open and carries the OpenData button.




> Jenny
>
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 3:33 AM, Jenny Molloy <jenny.molloy at okfn.org>
> wrote:
> > Hi All
> >
> > I've made quite a few changes to the PLoS Biology 'Community Page' on
> > the working group, this is the final draft and I hope to send it in
> > the next couple of days so now is your chance if you have any last
> > minute comments or suggestions!
> > http://okfnpad.org/sciencewg-PLoSBiology
> >
> > Many thanks
> >
> > Jenny
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Jenny Molloy <jenny.molloy at okfn.org>
> wrote:
> >> Hi All
> >>
> >> Thanks to those who have taken a look, if anyone else who would like
> >> to comment and change things could do so by Sunday evening, I'll
> >> attempt to get the revised version in to PloS on Monday.
> >>
> >> Jenny
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:05 AM, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk>
> wrote:
> >>> Thaks Jenny - tremendous material to get started with.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Jenny Molloy <jenny.molloy at okfn.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi All
> >>>>
> >>>> The OKF was approached recently by PLoS Biology to write a piece on
> the
> >>>> working group for their Community pages. I've drafted one, and it
> would be
> >>>> great if some of you could take a look and comment!
> >>>> http://okfnpad.org/sciencewg-PLoSBiology
> >>>> Please make edits, add comments throughout the text or at the end.
> >>>>
> >>>> Things to note:
> >>>> It is requested that we don't use this entirely as a self promotion
> >>>> activity and therefore focus mainly on a few things we do as opposed
> to
> >>>> listing them all,
> >>>
> >>> Agreed. It may be worth pointing out that the OKF(-science) can act as
> a
> >>> tool to collect and refine opintions and protocols. Unlike real-life
> >>> meetings where the attendence is based on protoplasm, this approach
> allows
> >>> anyone to participate. However the "product" is a considerable
> refinement of
> >>> the ideas that went in. OKF takes its output quality seriously.
> >>>
> >>>> so I've tried to find a balance whilst including enough activities to
> >>>> demonstrate the breadth of our scope. The focus is:
> >>>> The Open Definition
> >>>> The Panton Principles
> >>>> I have taken it as our position that we support the idea that
> scientific
> >>>> data should be open by default according to the Panton Principles
> (with all
> >>>> the usual caveats for privacy, special cases etc). I'm pretty sure
> that this
> >>>> reflects the views of most of the group, but I have mentioned that we
> are a
> >>>> diverse bunch :)
> >>>> I'd particularly like comments on:
> >>>> Have I made it clear enough that the piece is discussing data
> associated
> >>>> with published science (as per the PP)?
> >>>> Are there interesting cases/examples/analogies that you think would
> fit in
> >>>> the piece?
> >>>> Any general comments on content or style
> >>>> Please be frank - this is a great opportunity to get some exposure for
> the
> >>>> group (and make us citeable) so we want this to be as good as
> possible.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I agree we shouldn't advertise ourselves per se but it is worth making
> it
> >>> clear that OKF can have a role to play as a formal part in the
> development
> >>> of new protocols and approaches.
> >>>
> >>>> Thanks very much for your help!
> >>>> Jenny
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> open-science mailing list
> >>>> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> >>>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Peter Murray-Rust
> >>> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> >>> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> >>> University of Cambridge
> >>> CB2 1EW, UK
> >>> +44-1223-763069
> >>>
> >>
> >
>



-- 
Peter Murray-Rust
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
+44-1223-763069
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20110826/7725603b/attachment-0001.html>