[open-science] [okfn-discuss] "Open Access" publications under CC-NC licences
pm286 at cam.ac.uk
Thu Dec 8 08:52:39 UTC 2011
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 8:44 AM, Egon Willighagen <egon.willighagen at gmail.com
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Jenny Molloy <jenny.molloy at okfn.org>
> > PMR suggested generating a resource pack for publishers and funders on
> > use of the NC clause. We can couple this with Is It Open Data? requests
> > which will converge nicely with the need for clarification of publisher
> > positions with regard to text and data mining in response to the
> > Report.
> Open Science is a combination of data and methods. Or, the full ODOSOS
> standard. NCOA violates basic freedoms outlined in Open Standards and
> Open Source, and does therefore violate Open Science.
> If you make a pack like this, I suggest to include references to the
> Debian Free Software Guidelines (DFSG) which clearly disallow NC
> clauses. That means that any material with a NC clause cannot be
> redistributed at all on many platforms, and the DFSG can serve as a
> best practices people have adopted for many years now. I just wrote
> this up in my blog too .
Many thanks Egon. We owe a great debt to the Open Source movement. Without
their clarity of thought we would have little clear guidance.
> Dr E.L. Willighagen
> Postdoctoral Researcher
> Institutet för miljömedicin
> Karolinska Institutet (http://ki.se/imm)
> Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
> LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw
> Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
> PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
Reader in Molecular Informatics
Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
University of Cambridge
CB2 1EW, UK
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the open-science