[open-science] New comunity member
rene.dreos at gmail.com
Mon May 9 08:39:57 UTC 2011
thank you very much for this interesting discussion. I did not aspected such
a great response from you.
I totally agree with Peter when he correctly pointed out that data in
science is quite open and what need to be improved is "how" data is
presented. For this to be implemented, following the correct ontology is
essential. But as Egon wrote, most of the time data are shared just because
journals required it, not for an intrinsic desire of sharing info. If you
add that we have dead-lines for publishing papers, the info for a correct
analysis are often not well presented or missing (how long does it take to
write a paper compared to upload a dataset in GEO?). Would it be nice to
have a tool (?) to help scientists upload their data using the correct
ontology and providing just the right amount of informations needed?
On 8 May 2011 22:29, Peter Murray-Rust <pm286 at cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Heather Piwowar <hpiwowar at gmail.com>wrote:
>>> A list of MIAME (and all the other MI***s) could be very useful to show
>>> authors what should be published. This would be core OKF "business", while
>>> actually generating the specifications is already well handeld by the
>>> bioscience community.
>> Peter, are you thinking of a table of data standards, like this one?
> Yes - as usual I am happy to demonstrate my ignorance and be enlightened.!
> If all of this is Open and collaborative then the problem seems to be
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the open-science