[open-science] JISC report released today on value of text mining

Wed Mar 14 13:59:45 UTC 2012

That version wouldn't be as much fun.  I can't recall his precise words, but he warned that researchers who are providing free peer-review services to publishers now might very well end up offering those services directly to their own institutions (under a Gold system) instead of to commercial publishers, therefore publishers would do well to start looking for different business models.

On Mar 14, 2012, at 1:49 PM, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 1:46 PM, Diane Cabell <dc at icommons.org> wrote:
> Please don't. They are not direct quotes but rather my paraphrasing and not for publication.
> 
> 
> Pity. I though the "get real or die" was fantastic. Do you have a bowdlerised version? Even 1 para would do. The RCUK policy is great.
>  
> On Mar 14, 2012, at 11:58 AM, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> 
> >
> > Great, Diane,
> >
> > Are you going to blog this or can I post it verbatim?
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Peter Murray-Rust
> > Reader in Molecular Informatics
> > Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> > University of Cambridge
> > CB2 1EW, UK
> > +44-1223-763069
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Peter Murray-Rust
> Reader in Molecular Informatics
> Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry
> University of Cambridge
> CB2 1EW, UK
> +44-1223-763069

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20120314/70994a22/attachment-0001.html>