[open-science] open-science Digest, Vol 1223, Issue 1

[Malin Sandström]

Helena, det här kanske är intressant, för NPRC?

/Malin

On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 1:00 PM <open-science-request at lists.okfn.org> wrote:

> Send open-science mailing list submissions to
>         open-science at lists.okfn.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         open-science-request at lists.okfn.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         open-science-owner at lists.okfn.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of open-science digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Community Comments and Peer Review: A Preprint Commenting
>       Pilot at PLOS (David Knutson)
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: David Knutson <dknutson at plos.org>
> To: "open-science at lists.okfn.org" <open-science at lists.okfn.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 16:42:04 +0000
> Subject: [open-science] Community Comments and Peer Review: A Preprint
> Commenting Pilot at PLOS
>
> PLOS today launched a pilot to see if community feedback could help
> improve the quality and speed of the review process at a journal.
> Researchers have told us
> <https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/10/trends-in-preprints/> that posting
> manuscripts as preprints before—or at the same time as—submitting them to a
> journal is a great way to gain additional feedback from the community and
> improve their paper. So we wanted to put that feedback to the test.
>
> Starting today, PLOS staff will be checking comments left on preprinted
> submissions to *PLOS Computational Biology*
> <https://journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol/>*, **PLOS Genetics*
> <https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/>*, **PLOS Neglected Tropical
> Diseases * <https://journals.plos.org/ntds/>and *PLOS Pathogens*
> <https://journals.plos.org/pathogens/> using the PLOS preprint posting
> service. Those comments that could be relevant to the scientific evaluation
> of the manuscript will be made available to the editor handling the peer
> review of the manuscript at PLOS. At the discretion of the handling editor,
> useful comments can then complement the peer reviews that they have
> commissioned. As they are communicated to authors by the editor, these
> comments can then become part of the published peer review history for the
> article upon publication—making the entire review process completely
> transparent. You can read more about it on the *Official PLOS Blog
> <https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/11/community-comments-and-peer-review-a-preprint-commenting-pilot-at-plos/>*
> .
>
> David Knutson
>
> Sr. Communications Manager, PLOS
>
> Cell +1 651-260-8288
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> open-science mailing list
> open-science at lists.okfn.org
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/open-science
> Unsubscribe: https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/open-science
>


-- 
Malin Sandström, PhD
Community Engagement Officer
malin.sandstrom at incf.org

International Neuroinformatics Coordinating Facility
Karolinska Institutet
Nobels väg 15 A
SE-171 77  Stockholm
Sweden
http://www.incf.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/open-science/attachments/20191111/c6838b87/attachment.html>