<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<html><head><meta content="text/html; charset=utf-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head>Meaning Scholarship as a whole... There have to be some common sets of aims...<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Peter Murray-Rust <pm286@cam.ac.uk> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Jo Walsh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:metazool@fastmail.net">metazool@fastmail.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div>Started a list <a href="http://okfnpad.org/rfringe11-open-scholarship" target="_blank">http://okfnpad.org/rfringe11-open-scholarship</a><br>
<br>
Glad of the responses. Perhaps we are looking for a declaration rather than a definition. To say "we are doing Open Scholarship because we are doing X and Y". Then wouldnt have to be too exhaustive or qualified...<br>
</div></blockquote><div><br>Do you mean Scholarship or Science? They are significantly different> <br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>
<br>
Not sure when is the session planned for? Am otherwise engaged on the 4th most of the day :/<br><font color="#888888">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.</font><div class="im"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Michael Nielsen <<a href="mailto:mn@michaelnielsen.org" target="_blank">mn@michaelnielsen.org</a>> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);padding-left:1ex">
<div style="white-space:pre-wrap;word-wrap:break-word">
On Thu, 28 Jul 2011, <a href="mailto:cameron.neylon@stfc.ac.uk" target="_blank">cameron.neylon@stfc.ac.uk</a> wrote:
> I would say that the definitions, or at least visions that came out of
> the meeting in Geneva are as good as any. My personal position is that
> 'open science' is too big and diverse a church to capture with a single
> definition without offending at least some members of the broader
> community. Easier to articulate shared aims and to define more specific
> practices or beliefs within that.
I can definitely agree with that! This is part of why I'm not comfortable making a more formal definition of the term. I especially like Cameron's last sentence!
Cheers,
Michael
</div></blockquote></div></div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Peter Murray-Rust<br>Reader in Molecular Informatics<br>Unilever Centre, Dep. Of Chemistry<br>University of Cambridge<br>CB2 1EW, UK<br>
+44-1223-763069<br>
</blockquote></div></html>