[OpenDesign] Questions about the Open Design Definition
Massimo Menichinelli
massimo.menichinelli at aalto.fi
Tue Feb 26 14:38:13 UTC 2013
Hi all,
I've finally had time for getting back to our discussion about the Open
Design Definition. I've published a blog post about it (including the
presentation of the workshop held during the Open Knowledge Festival,
and few analysis that I did about our discussion) here:
http://www.openp2pdesign.org/2013/open-design/working-on-the-open-design-definition/
http://design.okfn.org/2013/02/26/working-on-the-open-design-definition/
In the post I've highlighted few questions regarding the Open Design
Definition, it would be great to have your comments about them here in
the mailing list or on the blogs. Let's start the discussion about the
definition again!
Here are the questions:
1. Are we focusing only on Product Design (i.e. something physical, and
that may be 3D printed) or are we talking about any kind of design?
Personally I’m trying to having a discussion on all the fields of
design, since there are already many different cases of Open Source in
Design in many fields (see the presentation above), but of course this
means that we have to describe a generic enough definition of Design, or
a definition that makes references to the different Design fields.
2. Shall we start from what Intellectual Property (IP) laws consider
Design, or from what designers consider Design? This choice would lead
to two very different definitions, so we have to decide this together:
starting from the IP laws viewpoint, it will be easier to define
licenses and IP strategies; starting from designers’ viewpoint will make
the definition easier to be understood by the Design community at large
3. And, related to this, shall we leave the discussion about licenses
out, or shall we include something in the definition?
4. What about the “source files” of a design project? Shall we consider,
in the definition, to ask about publishing also the source files (i.e.
vector drawing and not only the exported picture, CAD files and not only
the rendering pictures)
5. Shall we clarify and distinguish about the definition being about
Openness and/or Freedom? Or shall we include both in the definition?
6. Shall start preparing a draft of a definition, in order to start the
discussion to be more focused? From which existing definition should we
start?
What do you think about these issues?
Br,
Massimo
--
______________________________________________________________________________
Massimo Menichinelli
mobile: (ITA) +39 3402971655 (FIN) +358 505981442
Skype: openp2pdesign.org
http://it.linkedin.com/in/massimomenichinelli
______________________________________________________________________________
Aalto University
Aalto Media Factory - Aalto FabLab (Producer for the FabLab activities)
http://mediafactory.aalto.fi/
http://fablab.aalto.fi/
______________________________________________________________________________
openp2pdesign.org
Metadesign for Open Systems, Processes, Projects
http://www.openp2pdesign.org/
______________________________________________________________________________
More information about the opendesign
mailing list