[Openglam_members] Open Collections page - was Re: Doodle for next call
Marieke Guy
marieke.guy at okfn.org
Thu Feb 26 12:58:31 UTC 2015
Hi Beat,
Could you clarify what you mean by reproduced. To run Omeka you need to
have an instantiation on your server - is this what you would be after?
We could quite easily pull your content into the current system - most
of the metadata already fits - we could add contact as an extra field.
It could then be filtered by country e.g here is a search for US
collections
<http://omeka.okfn.org/items/browse?search=&advanced[0][element_id]=53&advanced[0][type]=is+exactly&advanced[0][terms]=US&range=&collection=&type=&user=&tags=&public=&featured=&exhibit=&geolocation-address=&geolocation-latitude=46.818188&geolocation-longitude=8.227511999999933&geolocation-radius=&submit_search=Search+for+items>
(all searches are contained in the url so this could be modified) or
maybe by geographic address or radius. This seems relatively
straightforward to do. Tags is another way we could do this.
Do you have any of this info as a CSV file? I could have a go at
importing it.
Marieke
On 26/02/2015 12:40, Estermann Beat wrote:
>
> Hi Marieke,
>
> Could this be reproduced on the Open Collections platform?
>
> http://make.opendata.ch/wiki/data:glam_ch
>
> -Would all the information fit somehow in your data model?
>
> -Would it be possible to display only datasets for Switzerland (or
> another subset?) – only via tags? Or can you filter the display on any
> data field?
>
> I would like to turn this inventory into a permanent one (right now
> it’s more something attached to the hackathon).
>
> The present solution is not really scaleable - Dokuwiki sucks, and the
> presentation on one single page has its limits.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Beat
>
> *From:*openglam_members
> [mailto:openglam_members-bounces at lists.okfn.org] *On Behalf Of
> *Marieke Guy
> *Sent:* Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2015 12:09
> *To:* Joris Pekel
> *Cc:* <openglam_members at lists.okfn.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Openglam_members] Open Collections page - was Re:
> Doodle for next call
>
> Thanks for reviewing Joris, really useful.
>
> A few comments:
>
> * *Rights* - I agree that the star system doesn't work but it would
> be nice to have a system in place that lets us showcase the most
> open collections. I'm currently trying out the exhibit option so
> this could be a way to highlight great work. Definitely something
> to be discussed in the call!
> * *Tags* - Currently these can be managed pretty easily within the
> system (batch editing, searching etc.). I'm just looking into how
> we manage these when people contribute items - there is a plugin
> for this - may need some configuring. Probably the easiest way to
> go forward would be to agree on a set of tags from the start.
> These can be extended to but it would still useful to have a list
> up front. Maybe something to brainstorm in the call?
> I'd like to suggest we add the following to the list as they tie
> in with the Europeana Space pilots: TV, Photography, Dance, Games,
> HybridPublishing, Museums
> Some brief guidelines might be useful too e.g. capitalised,
> content that doesn't fit into another metadata box etc.
> * *Accounts* - Still looking in to this - we seem to be able to get
> people in but it's a bit messy. If people want to look at the back
> end register (through the contribute page) and then email me.
>
> I can't make the meeting on 4th so Lieke should be able to support any
> discussions and pass feedback on. Agree that we need to get the basics
> right first so will park the other ideas for later.
>
> I'd like to share more widely soon but think I'd prefer to wait till
> we have some styling in place then people will also be able to share
> their thoughts on how it looks too. Hopefully not too long now!
>
> Any other comments hugely appreciated.
>
> Marieke
>
>
> On 26/02/2015 08:53, Joris Pekel wrote:
>
> Hi Marieke, all
>
> wow great progress! I have made some comments inline.
>
> Oh and while we are at it. We will be having our next call on the 4th
> of March at 17:00 CET
> <http://www.worldtimebuddy.com/?qm=1&lid=2747891,2643743,3451190,5391959&h=2747891&date=2015-2-26&sln=17-18>.
> I'll send out the link 5 min beforehand. Speak then!
>
> Do you think btw it is worth it to send it out to the wider list to
> ask for feedback Marieke?
>
> 2015-02-24 10:21 GMT+01:00 Marieke Guy <marieke.guy at okfn.org
> <mailto:marieke.guy at okfn.org>>:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I'm probably not going to be able to make the call as I'm away most of
> next week but I wanted to update you on how the Open Collections page
> is coming along.
>
> We now have a new site on a different server (the other was a test
> server). There is quite a bit of content and I'm just in discussions
> with our designer regarding the CSS and styling (to align it with the
> rest of the OpenGLAM site).
>
> The site is currently at http://omeka.okfn.org/ it will be moved to
> http://openglam.org/open-collections/ later on.
>
> Some areas I'd like help with:
>
> * We need to think about how we deal with rights. Should this be by
> star ratings for PD content (e.g.
> http://omeka.okfn.org/items/show/89) or is there another approach?
> Any ideas?
>
> I think stars for rights can be a bit problematic. I think we should
> just mention the rights and link to a page that explains them (PD
> Mark, CC BY etc.). Issue with stars is that they don't mean so much.
> If you are a very open institution, but you just don't happen to have
> that much material that is in the PD, does that mean you get less
> stars? A discussion we can have is what to do with material that is in
> the PD, but licensed with a CC BY license for example (Wellcome).
> Also, the 5 star system of Berners-Lee is mostly applicable on
> metadata I think, not so much on the content itself. If we look at the
> content with this system I think hardly any of them would get 5 stars.
>
> *
> * Any thoughts on the metadata we are collecting for each item?
> Is there more you'd like to see? We can use Dublin core
> <http://omeka.org/codex/Working_with_Dublin_Core> or make up
> our own fields
>
> I think DC is fine. Don't know if other people have thoughts?
>
> * I've started adding tags and you can browse these from here
> <http://omeka.okfn.org/items/tags?sort_field=name&sort_dir=a>
> - any thoughts on the type of tags we can add
>
> Can we limit them and people contributing pick one? For example
> 'castle' does not seem like the most useful one. Architecture for
> example should be there I think. If people are missing tags they can
> suggest and we can add. Not sure if we should add countries as tags,
> what do people think?
>
> * What should go on the search page
> <http://omeka.okfn.org/items/search> - is there currently too
> much? Should we reduce it/ restructure it?
>
> I think the search only gets useful if there is really a load of
> material up there, which is currently not the case. Also, I recently
> heard at Europeana Tech some good talks from people who are
> anti-search boxes. They don't guide the user at all. I much prefer to
> do it with proper tagging so people can browse by category.
>
> *
> * We need to test the contribution
> <http://omeka.okfn.org/contribution> page - anyone like to
> have a go?
>
> I created an account but it says my pw is incorrect. If I try to reset
> it gives an error..
>
> * Anyone technical care to have a look at the output formats -
> see the bottom of a browse page (atom, dcmes-xml, json,
> omeka-json, omeka-xml, rss2). There is an API available too -
> note to myself to look into this.
> * It was suggested that we could provide information about
> applications making use of these open GLAM collections - any
> ideas on how this could be done?
>
> I suggest we do this in the second phase of development. Let's get
> this right first.
>
> * Also suggested that we could provide a tracking system showing
> which collections are also available within Wikimedia Commons
> and/or Europeana, DPLA, or similar - thoughts on doing this?
>
> I think setting up a tracking system is a bit too much work atm.
> Perhaps we can add a field in the contributions page where we ask 'Set
> available in Europeana? Yes/No and the possibility to include the link.
>
> *
>
> Any other comments/suggestions more than welcome.
>
> Thanks
>
> Marieke
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joris
>
>
> On 23/02/2015 19:48, Joris Pekel wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> February has nearly ended, which means time for our next call.
>
> I have set up a Doodle here: http://doodle.com/p82zf584ticaczyz
>
> Hope may of you can make it!
>
> Cheers,
>
> Joris
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> openglam_members mailing list
>
> openglam_members at lists.okfn.org <mailto:openglam_members at lists.okfn.org>
>
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/openglam_members
>
> --
>
> Marieke Guy
> Project Coordinator | skype: mariekeguy | tel: 44 (0) 1285 885681
> | @mariekeguy <http://twitter.com/mariekeguy>
> Open Education Working Group <http://education.okfn.org/>
> Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/> | @okfn
> <http://twitter.com/okfn>| Facebook
> <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> | Blog
> <http://blog.okfn.org> | Newsletter
> <http://okfn.org/about/newsletter/>
> http://remoteworker.wordpress.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openglam_members mailing list
> openglam_members at lists.okfn.org
> <mailto:openglam_members at lists.okfn.org>
> https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/openglam_members
>
> --
>
> Marieke Guy
> Project Coordinator | skype: mariekeguy | tel: 44 (0) 1285 885681 |
> @mariekeguy <http://twitter.com/mariekeguy>
> Open Education Working Group <http://education.okfn.org/>
> Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/> | @okfn <http://twitter.com/okfn>|
> Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> | Blog
> <http://blog.okfn.org> | Newsletter <http://okfn.org/about/newsletter/>
> http://remoteworker.wordpress.com
>
--
Marieke Guy
Project Coordinator | skype: mariekeguy | tel: 44 (0) 1285 885681 |
@mariekeguy <http://twitter.com/mariekeguy>
Open Education Working Group <http://education.okfn.org/>
Open Knowledge <http://okfn.org/> | @okfn <http://twitter.com/okfn>|
Facebook <https://www.facebook.com/OKFNetwork> | Blog
<http://blog.okfn.org> | Newsletter <http://okfn.org/about/newsletter/>
http://remoteworker.wordpress.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.okfn.org/mailman/private/openglam_members/attachments/20150226/080deaa7/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the openglam_members
mailing list