[wdmmg-discuss] COINS contract

[Julian Todd]

Fairly standard in that it is dated 1999 (before FOI).  Doesn't
mention anything about trade secrets.  Therefore FOI should trump
this, unless they can prove that trade secrets are in the
screen-shots, and competitors never get hold of each other's
instruction manuals.  Who are there competitors anyway?

We may still be barking up the wrong hat-stand.  COINS is probably no
more than a visualization tool -- not the database.  What we need is
the part which explains how they import the data from the "*.money"
file they get emailed from the Home Office, and then go for these
imports.

JT


On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 4:00 PM, William Waites <wwaites at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 10-03-31 15:42, Lisa Evans wrote:
>>
>> The intellectual property rights are on page 41.
>
> Hmmm. Fairly standard as far as industry agreements go. I've seen that
> type of language before. Disappointing but unsurprising. It's worth
> looking at the definition of Deliverable as it relates to this contract.
> Is it just the software system or is it the data? Hard to believe that
> the Treasury would agree to such restrictions on the data itself...
>
> --
> William Waites <wwaites at gmail.com>
> Mob: +44 789 798 9965
> Fax: +44 131 464 4948
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wdmmg-discuss mailing list
> wdmmg-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/wdmmg-discuss
>