[pd-discuss] PD help

Wed Mar 9 02:03:39 UTC 2011

If the law went into effect in 2003, but it has not retroactive effects, it
didn´t affect the status of works already in the public domain.
However, it may extend the term of those works which original terms of
protection were still in force.
It would be amazing if a Mexican colleague tell us about.
A.

On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 8:34 PM, Peter B. Hirtle <pbh6 at cornell.edu> wrote:

> My understanding is that the Mexican law went into effect in 2003, and it
> was not retroactive.  That would mean that only authors who died after 1928
> are eligible for the life + 100 term.
>
> Perhaps someone can confirm.
>
> Peter Hirtle
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Mar 8, 2011, at 5:29 PM, "Alberto Cerda" <alberto at derechosdigitales.org>
> wrote:
>
> Mmmm.... I think the Mexican copyright law provides protection to copyright
> holder for the author's life plus 100 years. To my knowledge, that is the
> longest term, but, unfortunately, I do not know since when that terms apply.
> A.
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Peter B. Hirtle < <pbh6 at cornell.edu>
> pbh6 at cornell.edu> wrote:
>
>> Elizabeth, your comment makes me wonder…  Imagine that we wanted to know
>> with certainty that a non-posthumously published work is in the public
>> domain everywhere in the world.  What is the date before which everything
>> must be in the public domain?
>>
>>
>>
>> I am guessing that it might be authors who died before 1911.  That would
>> account for Côte d'Ivoire’s life + 99 year term, and it would also ensure
>> that items that received a 99 year term from publication would also have
>> expired copyrights (since I am limiting my question to non-posthumous
>> works).  Is there anything earlier?
>>
>>
>>
>> Can we say with certainty that a non-posthumously published work authored
>> by someone who died prior to 1911 is in the public domain everywhere in the
>> world?
>>
>>
>>
>> Peter Hirtle
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* <pd-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org>
>> pd-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org [mailto:<pd-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org>
>> pd-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org] *On Behalf Of *Elizabeth Townsend-Gard
>> *Sent:* Tuesday, March 08, 2011 3:54 PM
>> *To:* Public Domain discuss list
>> *Subject:* Re: [pd-discuss] PD help
>>
>>
>>
>> What jurisidictions are you interested?
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Guibault, L. < <L.Guibault at uva.nl>
>> L.Guibault at uva.nl> wrote:
>>
>> The composer is* Ralph Vaughan Williams* (born Down Ampney,
>> Gloucestershire <http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gloucestershire>, 12
>> oktober <http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/12_oktober> 1872<http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/1872>– died
>> Londen <http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Londen>, 26 augustus<http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/26_augustus>
>> 1958 <http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/1958>)
>>
>>
>>
>> On the basis of UK law, the duration of copyright in a work is calculated
>> on the basis of the life of the author + 70 years from his death. See
>> article 12 Copyright Patent Design Act 1988:
>> <http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/section/12>
>> http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/48/section/12
>>
>>
>>
>> 12 Duration of copyright in literary, dramatic, musical or artistic works.
>>
>>
>>
>> (1)The following provisions have effect with respect to the duration of
>> copyright in a literary, dramatic, musical or artistic work.
>>
>>
>>
>> (2)Copyright expires at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of
>> the calendar year in which the author dies, subject as follows.
>>
>>
>>
>> (3)If the work is of unknown authorship, copyright expires—
>>
>>
>>
>> (a)at the end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year
>> in which the work was made, or
>>
>>
>>
>> (b)if during that period the work is made available to the public, at the
>> end of the period of 70 years from the end of the calendar year in which it
>> is first so made available,
>>
>>
>>
>> subject as follows.
>>
>>
>>
>> (4)Subsection (2) applies if the identity of the author becomes known
>> before the end of the period specified in paragraph (a) or (b) of subsection
>> (3).
>>
>>
>>
>> (5)For the purposes of subsection (3) making available to the public
>> includes—
>>
>>
>>
>> (a)in the case of a literary, dramatic or musical work—
>>
>>
>>
>> (i)performance in public, or
>>
>>
>>
>> (ii)communication to the public;]
>>
>>
>>
>> (b)in the case of an artistic work—
>>
>>
>>
>> (i)exhibition in public,
>>
>>
>>
>> (ii)a film including the work being shown in public, or
>>
>>
>>
>> (iii)communication to the public;]
>>
>>
>>
>> but in determining generally for the purposes of that subsection whether a
>> work has been made available to the public no account shall be taken of any
>> unauthorised act.
>>
>>
>>
>> Since the identity of the author is known, the general rule applies. The
>> publisher is therefore entitled to claim copyright protection on the work.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Lucie Guibault
>>
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> Lucie Guibault
>>
>> Instituut voor Informatierecht
>>
>> Universiteit van Amsterdam
>>
>>
>>
>> Bezoekadres:
>>
>> Korte Spinhuissteeg  3, Kamer B2.17, Amsterdam
>>
>> Postadres:
>>
>> Kloveniersburgwal 48, 1012 CX Amsterdam, Nederland
>>
>>
>>
>> Tel: +31.20.525.3947
>>
>> Fax: +31.20.525.3033
>>
>> Email: L.Guibault at uva.nl
>>
>> Website: <http://www.ivir.nl>www.ivir.nl
>>
>>
>>
>> *Please note that I am not in the office on Mondays*
>>
>> ________________________________________________
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *From:* <pd-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org>
>> pd-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org [mailto:<pd-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org>
>> pd-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org] *On Behalf Of *Aaron Dunn
>> *Sent:* dinsdag 8 maart 2011 20:56
>> *To:* <pd-discuss at lists.okfn.org>pd-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> *Subject:* [pd-discuss] PD help
>>
>>
>>
>> Musopen.org is about to launch a recording project to record and release
>> a substantial set of music into the public domain. One of the pieces we are
>> interested in is Lark Ascending by Vaughan Williams. I was wondering if
>> anyone can help us definitively answer whether this piece is in the public
>> domain or not.
>>
>>
>>
>> It seems it was composed in 1914, and published in 1925, so I would think
>> that at that time copyrights were for the life of the piece not the
>> composer, which should now have passed, yet Oxford publishing is claiming a
>> copyright on the work. Anyone know why it would still be copywritten?
>>
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Aaron
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pd-discuss mailing list
>> <pd-discuss at lists.okfn.org>pd-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> <http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/pd-discuss>
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/pd-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Elizabeth Townsend Gard
>> Associate Professor,
>> Co-Director, Tulane Center for Intellectual Property Law and Culture, and
>> Director, The Durationator(r) Software/Usable Past Project
>> Tulane Law School
>> Weinmann Hall
>> 6329 Freret Street
>> New Orleans, LA 70118-6231
>> <townsend at tulane.edu>townsend at tulane.edu
>> <etownsendgard at gmail.com>etownsendgard at gmail.com
>> skype name:  elizabethtownsendgard
>> <http://www.durationator.com>www.durationator.com
>> (504) 862 - 8822
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pd-discuss mailing list
>>  <pd-discuss at lists.okfn.org>pd-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>>  <http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/pd-discuss>
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/pd-discuss
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/pd-discuss/attachments/20110308/0bbf9d6a/attachment.html>