[pd-discuss] Open Metadata Handbook: Recommendations

Primavera De Filippi primavera.defilippi at okfn.org
Mon Nov 28 16:31:43 UTC 2011


Hi all,
just to let you know that some updates have been made over the weekend
to Open Metadata Handbook
[http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Open_Metadata_Handbook/], in particular:

* It has been suggested we add schema.org to the recommendations page,
I have introduced it with a very short paragraph, it would be great if
anyone with a better knowledge of it would contribute to this section,
explaining what are the reasons we'd recommend the use of this
standard over the others for certain categories of works /
applications / etc.

* Also, it is now important to further develop the decision tree that
has been included in the Recommendation sections, in order to
represent the other criteria that should be taken into account. If you
are willing to discuss or to provide any kind of comments or
contribution on this matter, please don't hesitate to contact me
and/or to message the list with your ideas or suggestions !
And as usual, feel free to edit the wikibook as much as you can  :)

Cheers,
Primavera





On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Primavera De Filippi
<primavera.defilippi at okfn.org> wrote:
> Hi all !
> as the Recommendations section
> [http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Open_Metadata_Handbook/Recommendations] of the
> Open Metadata Handbook has grown a lot over the past few days, I have
> decided to try and organize the Interoperability section into a
> graph: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3f/Metadata-interoperability.png -
> It is only a preliminary version, so please don't hesitate to criticize it,
> improve it or just come up with a few comments about it.
> Ideally, this should form the basis for the decision tree that we would like
> to obtain in the end, so it would be great if you could build upon it in
> order to add the other elements that are still missing !
> As usual, if you have any questions or feedback, please don't hesitate to
> contact me or the list !
>
>
>




More information about the pd-discuss mailing list