[pd-discuss] Durationator collab?

Fri Apr 5 18:49:40 UTC 2013

Would be great to work more with Tulane in this area.

We spoke quite a bit with Elizabeth, Justin and others about this several
years ago (Justin even features in our Public Domain Calculators video [1]).

While I understand that Tulane's flowcharts are not going to be published
(and will not be openly licensed), they did kindly offer to review public
domain flowcharts that are worked on by others.

Elizabeth: do you think there's any chance that the new collaborative phase
that you're moving towards might include the publication of any of your
research for review by others? :-)

All the best,

Jonathan

[1] http://publicdomain.okfn.org/calculators/

On 3 April 2013 08:02, Primavera De Filippi <primavera.defilippi at okfn.org>wrote:

> Hi Elizabeth,
> I'm so happy to hear that you are moving along with the calculators.
> So are we, in fact,  things are moving along pretty well !
> It would be really great to see how we can work together, especially since
> we are mainly focused on European flowcharts, and you are mainly focused on
> the U.S., maybe we can see how we can help each others out to get a better
> overall result ?
> As I said, I'm available for a skype talk next week, monday or friday -
> if anyone else is interested, please feel free to join us !
> :)
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Townsend Gard, Elizabeth <
> townsend at tulane.edu> wrote:
>
>> We had a great time connecting at SJ and others at Berkman last week.  We
>> are moving to a new collaborative phase (we're nearly done with the first
>> stage of research like mad scientists alone in the lab) and are finally
>> able to seek out testing and strategic research partners (starting last
>> summer).  We are now working with University of Michigan and NYARC (MOMA,
>> Brooklyn Museum, and the Frick Collection) on small projects to better tune
>> our system to helping solve problems.  If anyone else has other ideas on
>> how to test our system, we would love ideas.
>>
>> We are hoping to have a working system up and available for people to
>> play with shortly.  We are still U.S. focused, but with materials for a lot
>> of other countries (as part of the U.S. paths).  If there is anyone that
>> would like to play/test/help, we would love to hear from you.
>>
>> It looks like y'all have made great progress.  We should chat again soon!
>>  We should also think about a testing bed that we could put through both
>> systems to see the results.  I think we've talk about that before.   Maybe
>> something for the summer?  It would be great fun.
>>
>>
>> Dr. Elizabeth Townsend Gard
>> Jill H. and Avram A. Glazer Professor in Social Entrepreneurship
>> Associate Professor in Law
>> Co-Founder and Co-Director, Tulane Center for IP Law and Culture
>> Co-Inventor and Director, Durationator(r) Copyright Experiment
>>
>> Tulane University Law School
>> 6329 Freret Street, Suite 355b
>> New Orleans, LA 70118
>> townsend at tulane.edu
>> (504) 862-8822 O
>> (504) 339-3857 C
>> skype: elizabethtownsendgard
>>
>>
>> ________________________________________
>> From: pd-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org [
>> pd-discuss-bounces at lists.okfn.org] on behalf of Samuel Klein [
>> meta.sj at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2013 8:37 PM
>> To: Public Domain discuss list
>> Subject: [pd-discuss] Durationator collab?
>>
>> Have any of the folks working on the Public Domain Calculators been in
>> touch with the Durationator project, out of Tulane?  They have their
>> own flowcharts for scores of countries (though perhaps not in quite
>> the same format) and are working on similar automated or
>> semi-automated ways to check the PD status of a work.  I met them last
>> week at Berkman in Cambridge and was impressed.
>>
>> Since some eras had laws where that status depends on filing
>> registration or renewals, and some works are expressly put into the
>> public domain, all of this work will hopefully trend towards a global
>> PD Registry where you can get not only the "estimated" PD status of a
>> work, but also the "confirmed" status where available.  And where you
>> can submit any research you have done to clear a work, to improve such
>> estimates.
>>
>> SJ
>>
>> --
>> Samuel Klein          @metasj           w:user:sj          +1 617 529
>> 4266
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pd-discuss mailing list
>> pd-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/pd-discuss
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/pd-discuss
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pd-discuss mailing list
>> pd-discuss at lists.okfn.org
>> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/pd-discuss
>> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/pd-discuss
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> pd-discuss mailing list
> pd-discuss at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/pd-discuss
> Unsubscribe: http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/options/pd-discuss
>
>

-- 
Jonathan Gray <http://jonathangray.org/> | @jwyg <http://twitter.com/jwyg>
Director of Policy and Ideas
The Open Knowledge Foundation <http://okfn.org/> |
@okfn<http://twitter.com/okfn>
Support our work: okfn.org/support
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/pd-discuss/attachments/20130405/bcaec371/attachment.html>