[annotator-dev] annotator-dev Digest, Vol 15, Issue 8

Jamie M Folsom jfolsom at MIT.EDU
Tue Jul 24 14:36:50 UTC 2012

Great to know that it's possible to customize the user experience with event hooks. That might suggest a CUSTOMIZING.markdown to complement the open shakespeare example implementation -- something for those who aren't building a new plugin but want to do something beyond configure existing plugins. Does that seem like it would be useful? If so, I'm glad to take it on, as I learn what should go in it ;-)

I also agree that it seems generally useful to have the annotation-hl-{#id} on each annotation.

Curious if I am on the right track to the latter with these changes to Annotator.coffee:


Thanks to you both!


On Jul 24, 2012, at 7:00 AM, <annotator-dev-request at lists.okfn.org>
 <annotator-dev-request at lists.okfn.org> wrote:

> Send annotator-dev mailing list submissions to
> 	annotator-dev at lists.okfn.org
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/annotator-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	annotator-dev-request at lists.okfn.org
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	annotator-dev-owner at lists.okfn.org
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of annotator-dev digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>   1. Re: Add ids to annotators (Nick Stenning)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2012 11:24:24 +0100
> From: Nick Stenning <nick at whiteink.com>
> Subject: Re: [annotator-dev] Add ids to annotators
> To: Randall Leeds <tilgovi at hypothes.is>
> Cc: "annotator-dev at lists.okfn.org" <annotator-dev at lists.okfn.org>,
> 	Jamie M Folsom <jfolsom at mit.edu>
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAMbnANX7n0L4042MNijypstSeL24U=ZpYoZBhnDFrBKb4t6OzA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
> Jamie and Randall wrote:
>> [stuff about attaching id attributes to annotation highlights]
> Is there any particular reason we wouldn't want this enabled by default?
> I mean sure, Jamie *could* do this with event hooks. But it seems to
> me to be an oversight on my part. I think we should, by default, add
> ids of the form "annotation-hl-#{id}" to highlights, if
> "annotation.id?".
> -N
> ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> annotator-dev mailing list
> annotator-dev at lists.okfn.org
> http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/annotator-dev
> End of annotator-dev Digest, Vol 15, Issue 8
> ********************************************

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/annotator-dev/attachments/20120724/296ec920/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 1579 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.okfn.org/pipermail/annotator-dev/attachments/20120724/296ec920/attachment-0003.bin>

More information about the annotator-dev mailing list